Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies
Eco-innovations are considered key in the transition towards a more sustainable economy. However, since there are several barriers to the adoption of eco-innovations, different instruments have been proposed to encourage their uptake, leading to instrument mixes. Analysis of these mixes has been sca...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/220366 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/220366 |
| Access Level: | acceso embargado |
| Palavra-chave: | Política ambiental Biotecnologia Química verda Enginyeria ambiental Environmental policy Biotechnology Green chemistry Environmental engineering |
| id |
ES_dc037250da033eb612ac169c5aee9e4e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/220366 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologiesTchórzewska, Kinga BarbaraRío González, Pablo delGarcia-Quevedo, JoseMartínez-Ros, EsterPolítica ambientalBiotecnologiaQuímica verdaEnginyeria ambientalEnvironmental policyBiotechnologyGreen chemistryEnvironmental engineeringEco-innovations are considered key in the transition towards a more sustainable economy. However, since there are several barriers to the adoption of eco-innovations, different instruments have been proposed to encourage their uptake, leading to instrument mixes. Analysis of these mixes has been scarce in the eco-innovation literature and mostly focused on static rather than dynamic combinations of instruments. This paper tries to cover this gap by assessing the <em>sequencing</em> of instruments to promote eco-innovation. To that aim we use a panel database of investments in green technologies by Spanish firms between 2010–2020. Our results show that the order in which the instruments are introduced (sequencing) affects the adoption of eco-innovation, although the effective sequencing effect slightly differs for different environmental technological innovation types (cleaner production vs. end-of-pipe). In both cases, using subsidies (“carrots”) first and then using environmental taxes (“sticks”) positively and significantly influence the adoption of environmental technologies. Results from heterogeneous analysis confirms that this is especially true for small and medium firms. Within carrots, it seems tax credits and subsidies are substitutes, whatever the sequence of their introduction is. These results have clear policy implications which cannot be derived from analyses of static policy mixes. They suggest that, if the aim is to promote the adoption of eco-innovations, carrots should be used first, and then sticks should be adopted. In addition, it warns against using tax credits and subsidies together, given their redundancy in promoting eco-innovation. If subsidies are introduced after tax credits have already been applied (or the other way around), substantial inefficiencies can be expected, increasing the costs of eco-innovation promotion without any added value in terms of effectiveness.Elsevier2025info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/220366Articles publicats en revistes (Economia)reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UBinstname:Universidad de BarcelonaInglésVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123835Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, vol. 210https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123835cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2025http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessoai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/2203662026-05-27T06:46:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies |
| title |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies |
| spellingShingle |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies Tchórzewska, Kinga Barbara Política ambiental Biotecnologia Química verda Enginyeria ambiental Environmental policy Biotechnology Green chemistry Environmental engineering |
| title_short |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies |
| title_full |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies |
| title_fullStr |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies |
| title_sort |
Carrot first, stick second? Environmental policy-mix sequencing and green technologies |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tchórzewska, Kinga Barbara Río González, Pablo del Garcia-Quevedo, Jose Martínez-Ros, Ester |
| author |
Tchórzewska, Kinga Barbara |
| author_facet |
Tchórzewska, Kinga Barbara Río González, Pablo del Garcia-Quevedo, Jose Martínez-Ros, Ester |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Río González, Pablo del Garcia-Quevedo, Jose Martínez-Ros, Ester |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Política ambiental Biotecnologia Química verda Enginyeria ambiental Environmental policy Biotechnology Green chemistry Environmental engineering |
| topic |
Política ambiental Biotecnologia Química verda Enginyeria ambiental Environmental policy Biotechnology Green chemistry Environmental engineering |
| description |
Eco-innovations are considered key in the transition towards a more sustainable economy. However, since there are several barriers to the adoption of eco-innovations, different instruments have been proposed to encourage their uptake, leading to instrument mixes. Analysis of these mixes has been scarce in the eco-innovation literature and mostly focused on static rather than dynamic combinations of instruments. This paper tries to cover this gap by assessing the <em>sequencing</em> of instruments to promote eco-innovation. To that aim we use a panel database of investments in green technologies by Spanish firms between 2010–2020. Our results show that the order in which the instruments are introduced (sequencing) affects the adoption of eco-innovation, although the effective sequencing effect slightly differs for different environmental technological innovation types (cleaner production vs. end-of-pipe). In both cases, using subsidies (“carrots”) first and then using environmental taxes (“sticks”) positively and significantly influence the adoption of environmental technologies. Results from heterogeneous analysis confirms that this is especially true for small and medium firms. Within carrots, it seems tax credits and subsidies are substitutes, whatever the sequence of their introduction is. These results have clear policy implications which cannot be derived from analyses of static policy mixes. They suggest that, if the aim is to promote the adoption of eco-innovations, carrots should be used first, and then sticks should be adopted. In addition, it warns against using tax credits and subsidies together, given their redundancy in promoting eco-innovation. If subsidies are introduced after tax credits have already been applied (or the other way around), substantial inefficiencies can be expected, increasing the costs of eco-innovation promotion without any added value in terms of effectiveness. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/220366 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/220366 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123835 Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2025, vol. 210 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123835 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
cc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Articles publicats en revistes (Economia) reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UB instname:Universidad de Barcelona |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Barcelona |
| reponame_str |
Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| collection |
Dipòsit Digital de la UB |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869421729097449472 |
| score |
15,812429 |