Religion and Neutrality: Myth, Principle, and Meaning
In examining the changing dynamic of the religious phenomenon in postmodern societies, legal studies have invented or imported a considerable number of terms that offer only the illusion of scientific precision. Grand words that inspire immediate acceptance and a sense of security include the follow...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2011 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/43668 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/43668 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 348.7 Derecho comparado Derecho eclesiástico Derecho constitucional 5602.02 Derecho Comparado 5601 Derecho Canónico 5605.04 Derecho Constitucional |
| Sumario: | In examining the changing dynamic of the religious phenomenon in postmodern societies, legal studies have invented or imported a considerable number of terms that offer only the illusion of scientific precision. Grand words that inspire immediate acceptance and a sense of security include the following: equality, nondiscrimination, liberty, and secularism. However, after this gratifying first impression, the jurist will take it upon himself to engage in a closer study to assess the scope, the ultimate implications, and the specific ramifications that such terms entail in reality. |
|---|