A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings

The construction industry has enormous impacts on the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. To mitigate these impacts, several researchers have explored a variety of methods that link Building Information Modeling (BIM) with methodologies for a holistic evaluation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Berges Álvarez, Ileana, Martínez Rocamora, Alejandro, Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/166689
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/166689
https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411070
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Building information modeling
Life cycle sustainability assessment
Life cycle assessment
Life cycle cost
Social life cycle assessment
id ES_d5da115aec9e39cdff4d69af5a85e3eb
oai_identifier_str oai:idus.us.es:11441/166689
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildingsBerges Álvarez, IleanaMartínez Rocamora, AlejandroMarrero Meléndez, MadelynBuilding information modelingLife cycle sustainability assessmentLife cycle assessmentLife cycle costSocial life cycle assessmentThe construction industry has enormous impacts on the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. To mitigate these impacts, several researchers have explored a variety of methods that link Building Information Modeling (BIM) with methodologies for a holistic evaluation of sustainability, such as Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA). However, the complete integration of BIM-LCSA still remains unresolved, with a series of challenges that must be overcome. Consequently, the aim of this article is to identify the advances and challenges of BIM-LCSA integration focused on buildings through a literature review of the existing solutions presented by researchers worldwide. The PRISMA 2020 protocol is used. A total of 135 articles published between 2010–2023 are reviewed for bibliometric analysis. Furthermore, an exhaustive analysis of the case studies is carried out, by taking into account the structure proposed by ISO 14040. The authors identify a gap in the literature mainly regarding the full integration of the three dimensions with BIM that facilitates a simultaneous on-the-air assessment, in addition to the lack of a standardized LCSA method of calculation.MDPIConstrucciones Arquitectónicas IITEP172: Arquitectura: Diseño y TécnicaUniversidad de Sevilla2024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/166689https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411070reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)InglésSustainability, 16 (24), 11070.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11070info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/1666892026-06-17T12:51:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
title A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
spellingShingle A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
Berges Álvarez, Ileana
Building information modeling
Life cycle sustainability assessment
Life cycle assessment
Life cycle cost
Social life cycle assessment
title_short A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
title_full A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
title_fullStr A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
title_sort A systematic review of BIM-based life cycle sustainability assessment for buildings
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Berges Álvarez, Ileana
Martínez Rocamora, Alejandro
Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn
author Berges Álvarez, Ileana
author_facet Berges Álvarez, Ileana
Martínez Rocamora, Alejandro
Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn
author_role author
author2 Martínez Rocamora, Alejandro
Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Construcciones Arquitectónicas II
TEP172: Arquitectura: Diseño y Técnica
Universidad de Sevilla
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Building information modeling
Life cycle sustainability assessment
Life cycle assessment
Life cycle cost
Social life cycle assessment
topic Building information modeling
Life cycle sustainability assessment
Life cycle assessment
Life cycle cost
Social life cycle assessment
description The construction industry has enormous impacts on the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. To mitigate these impacts, several researchers have explored a variety of methods that link Building Information Modeling (BIM) with methodologies for a holistic evaluation of sustainability, such as Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA). However, the complete integration of BIM-LCSA still remains unresolved, with a series of challenges that must be overcome. Consequently, the aim of this article is to identify the advances and challenges of BIM-LCSA integration focused on buildings through a literature review of the existing solutions presented by researchers worldwide. The PRISMA 2020 protocol is used. A total of 135 articles published between 2010–2023 are reviewed for bibliometric analysis. Furthermore, an exhaustive analysis of the case studies is carried out, by taking into account the structure proposed by ISO 14040. The authors identify a gap in the literature mainly regarding the full integration of the three dimensions with BIM that facilitates a simultaneous on-the-air assessment, in addition to the lack of a standardized LCSA method of calculation.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11441/166689
https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411070
url https://hdl.handle.net/11441/166689
https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411070
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sustainability, 16 (24), 11070.
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11070
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
instname_str Universidad de Sevilla (US)
reponame_str idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
collection idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869420762164625408
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia