Wildfire management in Mediterranean-type regions: paradigm change needed

During the last decades, climate and land use changes led to an increased prevalence of megafires in Mediterranean-type climate regions (MCRs). Here, we argue that current wildfire management policies in MCRs are destined to fail. Focused on fire suppression, these policies largely ignore ongoing cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Moreira, Francisco, Ascoli, Davide, Safford, Hugh, Adams, Mark A., Moreno, José M., Pereira, José M.C., Catry, Felipe X., Armesto, Juan, Bond, William, González, Mauro E., Curt, Thomas, Koutsias, Nikos, McCaw, Lachlan, Price, Owen, Pausas, Juli G., Rigolot, Eric, Stephens, Scott, Tavsanoglu, Cagatay, Vallejo, V. Ramón (Victoriano Ramón), Wilgen, Brian W. Van, Xanthopoulos, Gavriil, Fernandes, Paulo. M.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/159769
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/159769
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Incendis forestals
Mediterrània (Regió)
Forest fires
Mediterranean Region
Descripción
Sumario:During the last decades, climate and land use changes led to an increased prevalence of megafires in Mediterranean-type climate regions (MCRs). Here, we argue that current wildfire management policies in MCRs are destined to fail. Focused on fire suppression, these policies largely ignore ongoing climate warming and landscape-scale buildup of fuels. The result is a 'firefighting trap' that contributes to ongoing fuel accumulation precluding suppression under extreme fire weather, and resulting in more severe and larger fires. We believe that a 'business as usual' approach to wildfire in MCRs will not solve the fire problem, and recommend that policy and expenditures be rebalanced between suppression and mitigation of the negative impacts of fire. This requires a paradigm shift: policy effectiveness should not be primarily measured as a function of area burned (as it usually is), but rather as a function of avoided socio-ecological damage and loss.