A survey on sleep assessment methods

[EN] Purpose. A literature review is presented that aims to summarize and compare curren methods to evaluate sleep. Methods. Current sleep assessment methods have been classified according to different. criteria; e.g., objective (polysomnography actigraphy) vs.subjective (sleep questionnaires, diari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ibáñez, Vanessa, Cauli, Omar, Silva, Josep|||0000-0001-5096-0008
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repositorio:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/137997
Acceso en línea:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/137997
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Sleep
Sleep assessment
Sleep disorders
Sleep assessment methods
LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS
id ES_d4a20a7f82dd9d2156eb48cb4e73b4d2
oai_identifier_str oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/137997
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A survey on sleep assessment methodsIbáñez, VanessaCauli, OmarSilva, Josep|||0000-0001-5096-0008SleepSleep assessmentSleep disordersSleep assessment methodsLENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS[EN] Purpose. A literature review is presented that aims to summarize and compare curren methods to evaluate sleep. Methods. Current sleep assessment methods have been classified according to different. criteria; e.g., objective (polysomnography actigraphy) vs.subjective (sleep questionnaires, diaries...), contact vs. contactless devices, and need for medical assistance vs. self-assessment. A comparison of validation studies is carried out for each method, identifying their sensitivity and specificity reported in the literature. Finally, the state of the market has also been reviewed with respect to customers' opinions about current sleep apps. Results. A taxonomy that classifies the sleep, detection methods. IA deseriPtion of each method that includes the tendencies of their underlying technologies lanalyzed in accordance with the literature. A comparison in terms, of precision of existing validation studies and reports. Discussion. In order of accuracy, sleep detection methods may be arranged as follows: Questionnaire < Sleep diary < Contactless devices < Contact devices < Polysotnnography A literature review suggests that current subjective methods present a sensitivity between 73% and 97.7%, while their specificity ranges in the interval 50%-96%. Objective methods such as actigraphy present a sensibility higher than 90%. However, their specificity is low compared to their sensitivity, being one of the limitations of such technology. Moreover, there are other factors, such as the Patients Perception of her or his sleep, that can be provided only by subjective methods. Therefore, sleep detection methods should be combined to produce a synergy between objective and subjective methods. The review of the market indicates the most valued sleep apps, but it also identifies problems and gaps, e.g., many hardware devices have not been validated and (especially software apps) should be studied before their clinical use.PeerJDepartamento de Sistemas Informáticos y ComputaciónEscuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería InformáticaInstituto Universitario Valenciano de Investigación en Inteligencia ArtificialRepositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politècnica de València Riunet20182018-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/137997reponame:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valénciainstname:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Reconocimiento (by)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:riunet.upv.es:10251/1379972026-06-13T07:49:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A survey on sleep assessment methods
title A survey on sleep assessment methods
spellingShingle A survey on sleep assessment methods
Ibáñez, Vanessa
Sleep
Sleep assessment
Sleep disorders
Sleep assessment methods
LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS
title_short A survey on sleep assessment methods
title_full A survey on sleep assessment methods
title_fullStr A survey on sleep assessment methods
title_full_unstemmed A survey on sleep assessment methods
title_sort A survey on sleep assessment methods
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ibáñez, Vanessa
Cauli, Omar
Silva, Josep|||0000-0001-5096-0008
author Ibáñez, Vanessa
author_facet Ibáñez, Vanessa
Cauli, Omar
Silva, Josep|||0000-0001-5096-0008
author_role author
author2 Cauli, Omar
Silva, Josep|||0000-0001-5096-0008
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Informática
Instituto Universitario Valenciano de Investigación en Inteligencia Artificial
Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politècnica de València Riunet
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Sleep
Sleep assessment
Sleep disorders
Sleep assessment methods
LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS
topic Sleep
Sleep assessment
Sleep disorders
Sleep assessment methods
LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS
description [EN] Purpose. A literature review is presented that aims to summarize and compare curren methods to evaluate sleep. Methods. Current sleep assessment methods have been classified according to different. criteria; e.g., objective (polysomnography actigraphy) vs.subjective (sleep questionnaires, diaries...), contact vs. contactless devices, and need for medical assistance vs. self-assessment. A comparison of validation studies is carried out for each method, identifying their sensitivity and specificity reported in the literature. Finally, the state of the market has also been reviewed with respect to customers' opinions about current sleep apps. Results. A taxonomy that classifies the sleep, detection methods. IA deseriPtion of each method that includes the tendencies of their underlying technologies lanalyzed in accordance with the literature. A comparison in terms, of precision of existing validation studies and reports. Discussion. In order of accuracy, sleep detection methods may be arranged as follows: Questionnaire < Sleep diary < Contactless devices < Contact devices < Polysotnnography A literature review suggests that current subjective methods present a sensitivity between 73% and 97.7%, while their specificity ranges in the interval 50%-96%. Objective methods such as actigraphy present a sensibility higher than 90%. However, their specificity is low compared to their sensitivity, being one of the limitations of such technology. Moreover, there are other factors, such as the Patients Perception of her or his sleep, that can be provided only by subjective methods. Therefore, sleep detection methods should be combined to produce a synergy between objective and subjective methods. The review of the market indicates the most valued sleep apps, but it also identifies problems and gaps, e.g., many hardware devices have not been validated and (especially software apps) should be studied before their clinical use.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/137997
url https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/137997
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Reconocimiento (by)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Reconocimiento (by)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PeerJ
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PeerJ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
instname:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
instname_str Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
reponame_str RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
collection RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869420563826475008
score 15,300724