Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
An extended study of different sampling introduction approaches using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is presented for the determination of boron in steel samples. The following systems for sample introduction were applied: direct sample solution nebulization by continuous nebu...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2005 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/221676 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/221676 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Sampling systems Steels analysis Boron determination |
| id |
ES_d478f2199fac015e6d8016ac47fb3878 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/221676 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryGómez Coedo, AuroraDorado López, María TeresaPadilla, IsabelInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometrySampling systemsSteels analysisBoron determinationAn extended study of different sampling introduction approaches using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is presented for the determination of boron in steel samples. The following systems for sample introduction were applied: direct sample solution nebulization by continuous nebulization (CN) using a cross-flow nebulizer and with flow injection (FI), applied to 0.1% (m/v) and 0.5% (m/v) sample solutions, respectively; FI after iron matrix extraction, using acetylacetone-chloroform, and isotopic dilution (ID) analysis as the calibration method; FI with on-line electrolytic matrix separation; and spark ablation (SA) and laser ablation (LA) as solid sampling techniques. External calibration with matrix-matching samples was used with CN, SA, and LA, and only acid solutions (without matrix matching) with FI methods. When FI was directly applied to a sample solution, the detection limit was of 0.15 μg g-1, improving by a factor of 4 that was obtained from the CN measurements. Isotopic dilution analysis, after matrix removal by solvent extraction, made it possible to analyse boron with a detection limit of 0.02 μg g-1 and, with the on-line electrolytic process, the detection limit was of 0.05 μg g-1. The precision for concentrations above 10 times the detection limit was better than 2% for CN, as well as for FI methods. Spark and laser ablation sampling systems, avoiding digestion and sample preparation procedures, provided detection limits at the μg g -1 levels, with RSD values better than 6% in both cases. Certified Reference Materials with B contents in the range 0.5-118 μg g-1 were used for validation, finding a good agreement between certified and calculated values. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.This work was carried out with financial support from the European Community for Steel and Carbon (ECSC) and from the Commision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologı´a (CICYT).ElsevierEuropean Coal and Steel CommunityComisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España)Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]2020202020052020info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/221676reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Ingléshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2004.10.010Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/2216762026-05-22T06:33:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
| title |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
| spellingShingle |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Gómez Coedo, Aurora Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Sampling systems Steels analysis Boron determination |
| title_short |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
| title_full |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
| title_fullStr |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
| title_sort |
Evaluation of different sample introduction approaches for the determination of boron in unalloyed steels by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gómez Coedo, Aurora Dorado López, María Teresa Padilla, Isabel |
| author |
Gómez Coedo, Aurora |
| author_facet |
Gómez Coedo, Aurora Dorado López, María Teresa Padilla, Isabel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Dorado López, María Teresa Padilla, Isabel |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
European Coal and Steel Community Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología, CICYT (España) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72] |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Sampling systems Steels analysis Boron determination |
| topic |
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry Sampling systems Steels analysis Boron determination |
| description |
An extended study of different sampling introduction approaches using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is presented for the determination of boron in steel samples. The following systems for sample introduction were applied: direct sample solution nebulization by continuous nebulization (CN) using a cross-flow nebulizer and with flow injection (FI), applied to 0.1% (m/v) and 0.5% (m/v) sample solutions, respectively; FI after iron matrix extraction, using acetylacetone-chloroform, and isotopic dilution (ID) analysis as the calibration method; FI with on-line electrolytic matrix separation; and spark ablation (SA) and laser ablation (LA) as solid sampling techniques. External calibration with matrix-matching samples was used with CN, SA, and LA, and only acid solutions (without matrix matching) with FI methods. When FI was directly applied to a sample solution, the detection limit was of 0.15 μg g-1, improving by a factor of 4 that was obtained from the CN measurements. Isotopic dilution analysis, after matrix removal by solvent extraction, made it possible to analyse boron with a detection limit of 0.02 μg g-1 and, with the on-line electrolytic process, the detection limit was of 0.05 μg g-1. The precision for concentrations above 10 times the detection limit was better than 2% for CN, as well as for FI methods. Spark and laser ablation sampling systems, avoiding digestion and sample preparation procedures, provided detection limits at the μg g -1 levels, with RSD values better than 6% in both cases. Certified Reference Materials with B contents in the range 0.5-118 μg g-1 were used for validation, finding a good agreement between certified and calculated values. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| publishDate |
2005 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005 2020 2020 2020 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Publisher's version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/221676 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/221676 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2004.10.010 Sí |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| reponame_str |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| collection |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869420549888802816 |
| score |
15,812429 |