Liberty, liability and contractualism

Most egalitarians accept that a just society would not only require its members to share fairly in each other¿s fortunes and misfortunes but also empower them to decide various aspects of their lives for themselves. Egalitarians face consequent questions about the relevant types of luck as well as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Williams, Andrew
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Estado:Versión enviada para evaluación y publicación
Fecha de publicación:2006
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/72549
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72549
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199296439.003.0010
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/72549
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Misfortunes
Illustration
Concerning
Liberties
Capabilities
Descripción
Sumario:Most egalitarians accept that a just society would not only require its members to share fairly in each other¿s fortunes and misfortunes but also empower them to decide various aspects of their lives for themselves. Egalitarians face consequent questions about the relevant types of luck as well as the contours of the pertinent decision-making liberties. They also face questions about how to assign liability for the costs and benefits generated when individuals exercise those liberties. For illustration, consider some issues concerning luck, liberty, and liability raised by procreation. Egalitarians need to decide whether treatment for involuntarily infertile individuals should be publicly funded because of its impact on their welfare, or resources, or capabilities. They also need to decide whether there are any limits on parents¿ rights to decide the size of their families, and the extent to which the costs of reproductive choices should be borne by parents alone (Casal and Williams 2004).