Adsorptive removal of siloxanes from biogas
The valorization of biogas as a renewable energy source faces a major obstacle regarding its purification. Siloxane is one of the impurities that cause problems such as damages to equipment of combustion engines, turbines, and boilers used for biogas conversion to heat and electricity. In this revie...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:283055 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/283055 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/s13399-023-04478-1 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Renewable energy Biogas upgrading Siloxane removal Adsorption Activated carbon Metal organic frameworks (MOF) Graphene oxide |
| Sumario: | The valorization of biogas as a renewable energy source faces a major obstacle regarding its purification. Siloxane is one of the impurities that cause problems such as damages to equipment of combustion engines, turbines, and boilers used for biogas conversion to heat and electricity. In this review, adsorption for siloxane removal is widely discussed, with two specific approaches: adsorbents sensitivity to water and regeneration, two essential points for industrial application. Thus, determining factors in adsorbents capacity, reusability, and water tolerance including textural properties, surface functional groups, and hydrophobicity are deeply analyzed. Studies oriented to the optimization of traditional adsorbents such as activated carbon, silica gel, and aluminosilicates as well as newly emerging adsorbents such as metal organic frameworks, graphene oxides, and waste-derived materials are studied in detail in terms of reusability and water tolerance. Although activated carbon is commercially used, its low selectivity, pore blockage due to siloxane polymerization, and unsuccessful regeneration make it disadvantageous. Silica gel, however, shows better reusability as a result of less adsorbent-adsorbate dissociation energy. In addition, aluminosilicates, despite its low adsorption capacity, proved to be more practical for real biogas due to their high hydrophobicity. Graphene oxide cost and energy efficiency in their synthesis make them more industrially appealing candidates despite their low adsorption capacity. Finally, metal organic frameworks demonstrated high selectivity, high adsorption capacity, and more efficient regeneration and therefore have more advantages and less drawbacks, although the number of published studies is still limited. |
|---|