Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination.
PURPOSE: We compared the performance of an in-house-developed flow cytometry assay for intracellular cytokine staining (FC-ICS) and a commercially-available cytokine release assay (the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 Test [QF]) for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike (S)-reactive-IFN-?-producin...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | INCLIVA |
| Repositorio: | r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p16412 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16412 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | COVID-19 vaccine Flow cytometry-based immunoassay QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 S protein SARS-CoV-2 T cells |
| id |
ES_d410ff0d71f471f2ba3d8d7e0dc5cb06 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p16412 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination.Tormo, NuriaGimenez, EstelaMartinez-Navarro, MariaAlbert, EliseoNavalpotro, DavidTorres, IgnacioGimeno, ConcepcionNavarro, DavidCOVID-19 vaccineFlow cytometry-based immunoassayQuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2 S proteinSARS-CoV-2 T cellsPURPOSE: We compared the performance of an in-house-developed flow cytometry assay for intracellular cytokine staining (FC-ICS) and a commercially-available cytokine release assay (the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 Test [QF]) for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike (S)-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample included 141 individuals (all male; median age, 42 years; 20-72) who had been fully vaccinated with the Comirnaty® COVID-19 vaccine (at a median of 114 days; 34-145). Prior to vaccination, 91 were categorized as being SARS-CoV-2-naïve and 50 as SARS-CoV-2-experienced. A whole blood-based FC-ICS using 15-mer overlapping peptides encompassing the entire SARS-CoV-2 S protein was used for enumeration of virus-specific IFN-?-producing CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. The QF test (Ag1 for CD4(+) T cells and Ag2 for CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in combination) was carried out following the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: The FC-ICS and the QF assays returned significantly discordant qualitative results in both the entire cohort (P<0.001 with QF Ag1 and QF Ag2) and in SARS-CoV-2-naïve participants alone (P=0.005 and P=0.01, respectively). Discrepant results mostly involved FC-ICS positive/QF negative specimens. Overall, no correlation was found either between SARS-CoV-2 IFN-?- CD4(+) T-cell frequencies and IFN-? levels measured in the QF Ag1 tube (P=0.78) or between the sum of SARS-CoV-2 IFN-? CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell frequencies and IFN-? levels quantified in the QF Ag2 tube. CONCLUSION: The data suggest a greater sensitivity for the FC-ICS assay than the QF test, and urge caution when comparing SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immune responses assessed using different analytical platforms.SPRINGER2022info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16412EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASESISSN: 09349723ISSNe: 14354373reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVAinstname:INCLIVAInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p164122026-06-07T16:35:31Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. |
| title |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. |
| spellingShingle |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. Tormo, Nuria COVID-19 vaccine Flow cytometry-based immunoassay QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 S protein SARS-CoV-2 T cells |
| title_short |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. |
| title_full |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. |
| title_fullStr |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. |
| title_sort |
Performance comparison of a flow cytometry immunoassay for intracellular cytokine staining and the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 test for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tormo, Nuria Gimenez, Estela Martinez-Navarro, Maria Albert, Eliseo Navalpotro, David Torres, Ignacio Gimeno, Concepcion Navarro, David |
| author |
Tormo, Nuria |
| author_facet |
Tormo, Nuria Gimenez, Estela Martinez-Navarro, Maria Albert, Eliseo Navalpotro, David Torres, Ignacio Gimeno, Concepcion Navarro, David |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Gimenez, Estela Martinez-Navarro, Maria Albert, Eliseo Navalpotro, David Torres, Ignacio Gimeno, Concepcion Navarro, David |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19 vaccine Flow cytometry-based immunoassay QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 S protein SARS-CoV-2 T cells |
| topic |
COVID-19 vaccine Flow cytometry-based immunoassay QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 S protein SARS-CoV-2 T cells |
| description |
PURPOSE: We compared the performance of an in-house-developed flow cytometry assay for intracellular cytokine staining (FC-ICS) and a commercially-available cytokine release assay (the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 Test [QF]) for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2-Spike (S)-reactive-IFN-?-producing T cells after COVID-19 vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The sample included 141 individuals (all male; median age, 42 years; 20-72) who had been fully vaccinated with the Comirnaty® COVID-19 vaccine (at a median of 114 days; 34-145). Prior to vaccination, 91 were categorized as being SARS-CoV-2-naïve and 50 as SARS-CoV-2-experienced. A whole blood-based FC-ICS using 15-mer overlapping peptides encompassing the entire SARS-CoV-2 S protein was used for enumeration of virus-specific IFN-?-producing CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. The QF test (Ag1 for CD4(+) T cells and Ag2 for CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in combination) was carried out following the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: The FC-ICS and the QF assays returned significantly discordant qualitative results in both the entire cohort (P<0.001 with QF Ag1 and QF Ag2) and in SARS-CoV-2-naïve participants alone (P=0.005 and P=0.01, respectively). Discrepant results mostly involved FC-ICS positive/QF negative specimens. Overall, no correlation was found either between SARS-CoV-2 IFN-?- CD4(+) T-cell frequencies and IFN-? levels measured in the QF Ag1 tube (P=0.78) or between the sum of SARS-CoV-2 IFN-? CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell frequencies and IFN-? levels quantified in the QF Ag2 tube. CONCLUSION: The data suggest a greater sensitivity for the FC-ICS assay than the QF test, and urge caution when comparing SARS-CoV-2 T-cell immune responses assessed using different analytical platforms. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16412 |
| url |
https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16412 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SPRINGER |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SPRINGER |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES ISSN: 09349723 ISSNe: 14354373 reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA instname:INCLIVA |
| instname_str |
INCLIVA |
| reponame_str |
r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA |
| collection |
r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869420514483634176 |
| score |
15,812455 |