Supervised penalty-based aggregation applied to motor-imagery based brain-computer-interface

In this paper we propose a new version of penalty-based aggregation functions, the Multi Cost Aggregation choosing functions (MCAs), in which the function to minimize is constructed using a convex combination of two relaxed versions of restricted equivalence and dissimilarity functions instead of a...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Fumanal Idocin, Javier, Vidaurre Arbizu, Carmen, Fernández Fernández, Francisco Javier, Gómez Fernández, Marisol, Andreu-Pérez, Javier, Prasad, M., Bustince Sola, Humberto
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universidad San Jorge (USJ)
Repositório:Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
OAI Identifier:oai:academica-e.unavarra.es:2454/48167
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2454/48167
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Brain-computer interface
Motor imagery
Penalty function
Aggregation functions
Classification
Signal processing
Descrição
Resumo:In this paper we propose a new version of penalty-based aggregation functions, the Multi Cost Aggregation choosing functions (MCAs), in which the function to minimize is constructed using a convex combination of two relaxed versions of restricted equivalence and dissimilarity functions instead of a penalty function. We additionally suggest two different alternatives to train a MCA in a supervised classification task in order to adapt the aggregation to each vector of inputs. We apply the proposed MCA in a Motor Imagery-based Brain- Computer Interface (MI-BCI) system to improve its decision making phase. We also evaluate the classical aggregation with our new aggregation procedure in two publicly available datasets. We obtain an accuracy of 82.31% for a left vs. right hand in the Clinical BCI challenge (CBCIC) dataset, and a performance of 62.43% for the four-class case in the BCI Competition IV 2a dataset compared to a 82.15% and 60.56% using the arithmetic mean. Finally, we have also tested the goodness of our proposal against other MI-BCI systems, obtaining better results than those using other decision making schemes and Deep Learning on the same datasets.