Indoleamine, 2-3 dioxygenase activity could be an early marker of graft rejection in heart transplantation

Background: The indoleamine, 2-3 dioxygenase (IDO) is an inducible intracellular enzyme with immunosuppressive effects mainly on lymphocyte populations. It has been postulated that indirect determination of IDO serum activity may be a marker of renal graft rejection, but its potential usefulness in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Barge Caballero, Eduardo, Crespo Leiro, Marisa, Domenech García, Nieves, Castro Beiras, Alfonso, Suárez Fuentetaja, Natalia, Paniagua Martín, María Jesús, Grille Cancela, Zulaika, Marzoa Rivas, Raquel, Muñiz García, Javier, Pombo Otero, Jorge
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2012
País:España
Institución:Servizo Galego de Saúde (SERGAS)
Repositorio:RUNA. Repositorio da Consellería de Sanidade e Sergas
OAI Identifier:oai:runa.sergas.gal:20.500.11940/7790
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/7790
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Supervivencia de Injerto
Heart Transplantation
Indoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxygenase
Rechazo de Injerto
Trasplante de Corazón
Indolamina-Pirrol 2,3,-Dioxigenasa
Descripción
Sumario:Background: The indoleamine, 2-3 dioxygenase (IDO) is an inducible intracellular enzyme with immunosuppressive effects mainly on lymphocyte populations. It has been postulated that indirect determination of IDO serum activity may be a marker of renal graft rejection, but its potential usefulness in heart transplantation (HT) is unknown. Methods: This longitudinal study included 98 HT patients (83% males) who survived ≥1 year. Mean age was 54.14 ± 11.57 years. Serum IDO activity was analyzed one month after HT by means of high performance liquid chromatography and correlated with the cumulative incidence of acute rejection (AR) during one-year follow-up. AR was defined as biopsy-proven ≥ ISHLT grade 2R rejection or empirically treated non-biopsy-proven rejection. The study sample was divided into two groups: AR group (n = 51), including patients who experienced at least one AR episode during the first year after HT; No-AR group (N = 47), including the remaining patients. Results: Mean serum IDO activity one month after HT was significantly higher (P = .021) in the AR group (3.32 ± 1.56) than in the no-AR group (2.62 ± 1.35). No significant association between serum IDO activity and gender (male: 3.1 ± 1.56, women: 2.43 ± 0.99, P = .092), recipient age (r = -.07, P = .943) or donor age (r = 0.108, P = 0.293) was observed. By means of binary logistic regression, an odds ratio of 1.4 [CI 95%: 1.033-1.876, P = .03] per unit increase of act-IDO was estimated, with no significant modification upon forced adjustment for age and sex. Mean glomerular filtration rate 1 month after HT was 67.01 ± 28.51 mL/min/m(2). No significant correlation between this parameter and serum IDO activity was observed (r = .160, P = .117). Conclusions: Our study suggests that serum IDO activity one month after HT might be associated with a higher risk of AR during one-year follow-up. This association seems to be independent of recipient gender, age or renal function.