Midwifery on the border between the closed and the open. How philosophical practice might contribute to scientific change
My article discusses the possibility to use philosophical practice as a tool for scientific research. It departs from the claim that there are stages in the development of the sciences when philosophy reemerges. This happens when the sciences face open questions calling for a restructuring of the sc...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/58643 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11441/58643 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Midwifery Scientific change Socratic dialogue Open questions Mayeútica Cambio científico Diálogo socrático Preguntas abiertas |
| Sumario: | My article discusses the possibility to use philosophical practice as a tool for scientific research. It departs from the claim that there are stages in the development of the sciences when philosophy reemerges. This happens when the sciences face open questions calling for a restructuring of the scientific framework. It is suggested that the methods of philosophical practice may turn out useful in such a process |
|---|