Publicación de monografías en acceso abierto por editoriales universitarias Españolas
The open access model for publishing monographs by the members of the Spanish Universities Publishers Association (UNE) is analyzed. The study focused on production data from 2015-2017, as well as the positioning and arguments of the editors in relation to the open access movement, publication, rela...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) |
| Repositorio: | O2, repositorio institucional de la UOC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:openaccess.uoc.edu:10609/93225 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10609/93225 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | university publishers university presses open access monographs surveys interviews questionnaires funding policies Spanish universities publisher association UNE editoriales universitarias prensa universitaria acceso abierto monografías encuestas cuestionarios entrevistas financiación políticas Unión de editoriales universitarias españolas editorials universitàries premsa universitària accés obert monografies enquestes qüestionaris entrevistes finançament polítiques Unió d'editorials universitàries espanyoles Open access publishing Edició d'accés obert Edición de acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | The open access model for publishing monographs by the members of the Spanish Universities Publishers Association (UNE) is analyzed. The study focused on production data from 2015-2017, as well as the positioning and arguments of the editors in relation to the open access movement, publication, related policies, and financing modalities. Data was collected by a questionnaire (with a response rate of 58% of the publishers associated with UNE) and includes in-depth interviews with seven of them. The results show that 75% of UNE members publish titles in open access, most consider open access a good way to increase the dissemination of monographs, and that there are no differences in content quality with non-open access works. Publishers do not see that publishing in open access is compatible with the commercial exploitation of printed copies. Publishers consider the most effective financing channels to be institutional payment (i.e., the university), followed by publisher's self-financing, and payment by the author. |
|---|