Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues

Purpose: The objective of this prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to analyze and compare the clinical behavior of three types of prosthesis supported by single implants in the posterior region after three years functional loading. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five implants were divide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Agustin-Panadero, R, Bustamante-Hernandez, N, Sola-Ruiz, MF, Zubizarreta-Macho, A, Fons-Font, A, Fernandez-Estevan, L
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:INCLIVA
Repositorio:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
OAI Identifier:oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p4104
Acceso en línea:https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/4104
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:implant-supported prosthesis
bone loss
hard tissue
screwed
cemented BOPT
id ES_cf3bc6a5fca3dbf1cce4f8ea7803c12e
oai_identifier_str oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p4104
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard TissuesAgustin-Panadero, RBustamante-Hernandez, NSola-Ruiz, MFZubizarreta-Macho, AFons-Font, AFernandez-Estevan, Limplant-supported prosthesisbone losshard tissuescrewedcemented BOPTPurpose: The objective of this prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to analyze and compare the clinical behavior of three types of prosthesis supported by single implants in the posterior region after three years functional loading. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five implants were divided into three groups according to the type of prosthetic restoration: screw-retained crown (Group GS); cemented crown without finishing line (biologically oriented preparation technique) (Group GBOPT); and conventional cemented crown with finishing line (Group GCC). The clinical behavior of each restoration type was analyzed after 3 years functional loading by analyzing radiographic peri-implant bone loss. Results: GBOPT obtained the least bone loss (p < 0.01) in comparison with GS and GCC. Conclusions: Bone loss around implants is related to the type of prosthetic restoration it supports, whereby cemented BOPT crowns present less bone loss.MDPI2019info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/4104Journal of Clinical MedicineISSN: 20770383reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVAinstname:INCLIVAInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p41042026-06-07T16:35:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
title Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
spellingShingle Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
Agustin-Panadero, R
implant-supported prosthesis
bone loss
hard tissue
screwed
cemented BOPT
title_short Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
title_full Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
title_fullStr Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
title_sort Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part I: Hard Tissues
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Agustin-Panadero, R
Bustamante-Hernandez, N
Sola-Ruiz, MF
Zubizarreta-Macho, A
Fons-Font, A
Fernandez-Estevan, L
author Agustin-Panadero, R
author_facet Agustin-Panadero, R
Bustamante-Hernandez, N
Sola-Ruiz, MF
Zubizarreta-Macho, A
Fons-Font, A
Fernandez-Estevan, L
author_role author
author2 Bustamante-Hernandez, N
Sola-Ruiz, MF
Zubizarreta-Macho, A
Fons-Font, A
Fernandez-Estevan, L
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv implant-supported prosthesis
bone loss
hard tissue
screwed
cemented BOPT
topic implant-supported prosthesis
bone loss
hard tissue
screwed
cemented BOPT
description Purpose: The objective of this prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to analyze and compare the clinical behavior of three types of prosthesis supported by single implants in the posterior region after three years functional loading. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five implants were divided into three groups according to the type of prosthetic restoration: screw-retained crown (Group GS); cemented crown without finishing line (biologically oriented preparation technique) (Group GBOPT); and conventional cemented crown with finishing line (Group GCC). The clinical behavior of each restoration type was analyzed after 3 years functional loading by analyzing radiographic peri-implant bone loss. Results: GBOPT obtained the least bone loss (p < 0.01) in comparison with GS and GCC. Conclusions: Bone loss around implants is related to the type of prosthetic restoration it supports, whereby cemented BOPT crowns present less bone loss.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/4104
url https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/4104
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Medicine
ISSN: 20770383
reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
instname:INCLIVA
instname_str INCLIVA
reponame_str r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
collection r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869420063773163520
score 15.81155

Similares en LA Referencia