Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review

We conducted a systematic review of 502 articles, published between 2000 and 2016, to characterize the research on human-carnivore relations according to (i) temporal and geographical distribution, (ii) biology, (iii) relations between carnivores and humans, (iv) social actors, (v) drivers of change...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lozano, Jorge, Olszańska, Agnieszka, Morales-Reyes, Zebensui, Castro, Antonio A., Malo, Aurelio, Moleón, Marcos, Sánchez Zapata, José Antonio, Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara, von Wehrden, Henrik, Dorresteijn, Ine, Kansky PhD, Ruth, Fischer, Joern, Martín-López, Berta
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
Repositorio:REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMH
OAI Identifier:oai:dspace.umh.es:11000/33891
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11000/33891
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Carnivore conservation
Ecosystem services
Human-wildlife conflicts
Interdisciplinary research
Nature's contributions to people
Social-ecological relations
CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::57 - Biología
id ES_ce936897f44f3db71cbc48c7006865df
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.umh.es:11000/33891
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Human-carnivore relations: A systematic reviewLozano, JorgeOlszańska, AgnieszkaMorales-Reyes, ZebensuiCastro, Antonio A.Malo, AurelioMoleón, MarcosSánchez Zapata, José AntonioCortés-Avizanda, Ainaravon Wehrden, HenrikDorresteijn, IneKansky PhD, RuthFischer, JoernMartín-López, BertaCarnivore conservationEcosystem servicesHuman-wildlife conflictsInterdisciplinary researchNature's contributions to peopleSocial-ecological relationsCDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::57 - BiologíaWe conducted a systematic review of 502 articles, published between 2000 and 2016, to characterize the research on human-carnivore relations according to (i) temporal and geographical distribution, (ii) biology, (iii) relations between carnivores and humans, (iv) social actors, (v) drivers of change, (vi) management, and (vii) applied methods. We performed a detrended correspondence analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests to identify and describe thematic clusters used in human-carnivore relations research. Our results show that research is deeply biased so far, and four important knowledge gaps were detected. First, we found more studies had been conducted in the Global North than in the Global South, although risks and benefits of living alongside carnivores exist in the Global South equally. Second, most research focused on large predators, while small and mediumsized carnivores are also source of damages and ecosystem services. Third, relations were often framed around conflicts, with little attention to possible ecosystem services. Fourth, most research was carried out using natural sciences methods, despite methods from the social sciences having much to offer in this context. Research fell into seven thematic clusters focusing on: (1) North-American bears, (2) African large carnivores, (3) social research in America, (4) meso-carnivores, (5) Asian felids, (6) conflicts with the grey wolf, and (7) damages to human property. These results highlight the need for more integrative, social-ecological research on humancarnivore relations. We discuss how addressing existing knowledge gaps could contribute to mitigating conflicts as well as fostering coexistence between humans and carnivore species.ElsevierDepartamentos de la UMH::Biología Aplicada202420242019info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdf13application/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/33891reponame:REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMHinstname:Universidad Miguel Hernández de ElcheIngléshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/oai:dspace.umh.es:11000/338912026-05-27T13:36:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
title Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
spellingShingle Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
Lozano, Jorge
Carnivore conservation
Ecosystem services
Human-wildlife conflicts
Interdisciplinary research
Nature's contributions to people
Social-ecological relations
CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::57 - Biología
title_short Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
title_full Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
title_fullStr Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
title_sort Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lozano, Jorge
Olszańska, Agnieszka
Morales-Reyes, Zebensui
Castro, Antonio A.
Malo, Aurelio
Moleón, Marcos
Sánchez Zapata, José Antonio
Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara
von Wehrden, Henrik
Dorresteijn, Ine
Kansky PhD, Ruth
Fischer, Joern
Martín-López, Berta
author Lozano, Jorge
author_facet Lozano, Jorge
Olszańska, Agnieszka
Morales-Reyes, Zebensui
Castro, Antonio A.
Malo, Aurelio
Moleón, Marcos
Sánchez Zapata, José Antonio
Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara
von Wehrden, Henrik
Dorresteijn, Ine
Kansky PhD, Ruth
Fischer, Joern
Martín-López, Berta
author_role author
author2 Olszańska, Agnieszka
Morales-Reyes, Zebensui
Castro, Antonio A.
Malo, Aurelio
Moleón, Marcos
Sánchez Zapata, José Antonio
Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara
von Wehrden, Henrik
Dorresteijn, Ine
Kansky PhD, Ruth
Fischer, Joern
Martín-López, Berta
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Departamentos de la UMH::Biología Aplicada
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Carnivore conservation
Ecosystem services
Human-wildlife conflicts
Interdisciplinary research
Nature's contributions to people
Social-ecological relations
CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::57 - Biología
topic Carnivore conservation
Ecosystem services
Human-wildlife conflicts
Interdisciplinary research
Nature's contributions to people
Social-ecological relations
CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::57 - Biología
description We conducted a systematic review of 502 articles, published between 2000 and 2016, to characterize the research on human-carnivore relations according to (i) temporal and geographical distribution, (ii) biology, (iii) relations between carnivores and humans, (iv) social actors, (v) drivers of change, (vi) management, and (vii) applied methods. We performed a detrended correspondence analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests to identify and describe thematic clusters used in human-carnivore relations research. Our results show that research is deeply biased so far, and four important knowledge gaps were detected. First, we found more studies had been conducted in the Global North than in the Global South, although risks and benefits of living alongside carnivores exist in the Global South equally. Second, most research focused on large predators, while small and mediumsized carnivores are also source of damages and ecosystem services. Third, relations were often framed around conflicts, with little attention to possible ecosystem services. Fourth, most research was carried out using natural sciences methods, despite methods from the social sciences having much to offer in this context. Research fell into seven thematic clusters focusing on: (1) North-American bears, (2) African large carnivores, (3) social research in America, (4) meso-carnivores, (5) Asian felids, (6) conflicts with the grey wolf, and (7) damages to human property. These results highlight the need for more integrative, social-ecological research on humancarnivore relations. We discuss how addressing existing knowledge gaps could contribute to mitigating conflicts as well as fostering coexistence between humans and carnivore species.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11000/33891
url https://hdl.handle.net/11000/33891
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.002
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
13
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMH
instname:Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
instname_str Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
reponame_str REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMH
collection REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMH
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869420003868016640
score 15.812429

Similares en LA Referencia