La perspectiva como forma simbólica, una vez más. Elementos para una revalorización de la perspectiva y la visualidad en Arquitectura
[EN] Although Panofsky s arguments have come under criticism for quite some time, they still seem to play a key role in the current disregard to perspective in architectural education. However, it is not clear that the essay expresses a negative conclusion about perspective. Furthermore, abstraction...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Publication Date: | 2012 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repository: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Language: | Spanish |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/227358 |
| Online Access: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/227358 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Perspective Architectural education Architectural drawing Architectural representation Perspectiva Formación del arquitecto Dibujo arquitectónico Representación arquitectónica |
| Summary: | [EN] Although Panofsky s arguments have come under criticism for quite some time, they still seem to play a key role in the current disregard to perspective in architectural education. However, it is not clear that the essay expresses a negative conclusion about perspective. Furthermore, abstraction certainly implied the denial of perspective in Painting but, according to the opinion of the most celebrated masters of Modern Movement, not in Architecture. |
|---|