Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology
[EN] The objective of this article is to carry out a review of the links between institutional and post-Keynesian economics, in order to raise the possible compatibility and even complementarity between the two branches of economic thought. To this end, we first review the question of compatibility...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de León |
| Repositorio: | BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/15889 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10612/15889 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Economía Institutional economics Post-Keynesian economics Methodology Critical realism Babylonian approach econom |
| id |
ES_cda52c9997af4dee9742ffbea18f7444 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/15889 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodologyFernández Huerga, Eduardo ClaudioPardo Fanjul, AnaSalvador Chamorro, Ana IsabelEconomíaInstitutional economicsPost-Keynesian economicsMethodologyCritical realismBabylonian approacheconom[EN] The objective of this article is to carry out a review of the links between institutional and post-Keynesian economics, in order to raise the possible compatibility and even complementarity between the two branches of economic thought. To this end, we first review the question of compatibility from the perspective of institutional economics and then from the post-keynesian standpoint. Next, methodological issues are addressed by presenting the essential elements that characterize post-keynesian and institutional methodology (and internal debates in this regard) and then by describing the areas of compatibility between the two. The final section presents the main conclusions and summarizes the basic elements that could constitute a theoretical framework of synthesis between institutional and post-keynesian economics.SIPublicación en abierto financiada por el Consorcio de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Castilla y León (BUCLE), con cargo al Programa Operativo 2014ES16RFOP009 FEDER 2014-2020 DE CASTILLA Y LEÓN, Actuación:20007-CL - Apoyo Consorcio BUCLESpringerEconomia AplicadaFacultad de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10612/15889reponame:BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Leóninstname:Universidad de LeónIngléshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/158892026-06-24T12:43:27Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology |
| title |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology |
| spellingShingle |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology Fernández Huerga, Eduardo Claudio Economía Institutional economics Post-Keynesian economics Methodology Critical realism Babylonian approach econom |
| title_short |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology |
| title_full |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology |
| title_fullStr |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology |
| title_sort |
Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Fernández Huerga, Eduardo Claudio Pardo Fanjul, Ana Salvador Chamorro, Ana Isabel |
| author |
Fernández Huerga, Eduardo Claudio |
| author_facet |
Fernández Huerga, Eduardo Claudio Pardo Fanjul, Ana Salvador Chamorro, Ana Isabel |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pardo Fanjul, Ana Salvador Chamorro, Ana Isabel |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Economia Aplicada Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Economía Institutional economics Post-Keynesian economics Methodology Critical realism Babylonian approach econom |
| topic |
Economía Institutional economics Post-Keynesian economics Methodology Critical realism Babylonian approach econom |
| description |
[EN] The objective of this article is to carry out a review of the links between institutional and post-Keynesian economics, in order to raise the possible compatibility and even complementarity between the two branches of economic thought. To this end, we first review the question of compatibility from the perspective of institutional economics and then from the post-keynesian standpoint. Next, methodological issues are addressed by presenting the essential elements that characterize post-keynesian and institutional methodology (and internal debates in this regard) and then by describing the areas of compatibility between the two. The final section presents the main conclusions and summarizes the basic elements that could constitute a theoretical framework of synthesis between institutional and post-keynesian economics. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10612/15889 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10612/15889 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León instname:Universidad de León |
| instname_str |
Universidad de León |
| reponame_str |
BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León |
| collection |
BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869419873715617792 |
| score |
15,301603 |