Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colon cancer screening though some polyps are still missed, thus preventing early disease detection and treatment. Several computational systems have been proposed to assist polyp detection during colonoscopy but so far without consistent evaluation. The lack of...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:2445/123294 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/123294 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Colonoscòpia Càncer colorectal Endoscòpia Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Endoscopy |
| id |
ES_cd47b4c7377729f242a519db47e2faef |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:2445/123294 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision ChallengeBernal, JorgeTajbakhsh, NimaSánchez, F. JavierMatuszewski, Bogdan J.Chen, HaoYu, LequanAngermann, QuentinRomain, OlivierRustad, BjornBalasingham, IlangkoPogorelov, KonstantinChoi, SungbinDebard, QuentinMaier-Hein, LenaSpeidel, StefanieStoyanov, DanailBrandao, PatrickCordova, HenrySánchez Montes, CristinaGurudu, Suryakanth R.Fernández Esparrach, GlòriaDray, XavierLiang, JianmingHistace, AymericColonoscòpiaCàncer colorectalEndoscòpiaColonoscopyColorectal cancerEndoscopyColonoscopy is the gold standard for colon cancer screening though some polyps are still missed, thus preventing early disease detection and treatment. Several computational systems have been proposed to assist polyp detection during colonoscopy but so far without consistent evaluation. The lack of publicly available annotated databases has made it difficult to compare methods and to assess if they achieve performance levels acceptable for clinical use. The Automatic Polyp Detection sub-challenge, conducted as part of the Endoscopic Vision Challenge (http://endovis.grand-challenge.org) at the international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2015, was an effort to address this need. In this paper, we report the results of this comparative evaluation of polyp detection methods, as well as describe additional experiments to further explore differences between methods. We define performance metrics and provide evaluation databases that allow comparison of multiple methodologies. Results show that convolutional neural networks are the state of the art. Nevertheless, it is also demonstrated that combining different methodologies can lead to an improved overall performance.Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)2018201820172018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion18 p.application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/123294Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2017, vol. 36, num. 6, p. 1231-1249https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042(c) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/1232942026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge |
| title |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge |
| spellingShingle |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge Bernal, Jorge Colonoscòpia Càncer colorectal Endoscòpia Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Endoscopy |
| title_short |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge |
| title_full |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge |
| title_fullStr |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge |
| title_sort |
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results from the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bernal, Jorge Tajbakhsh, Nima Sánchez, F. Javier Matuszewski, Bogdan J. Chen, Hao Yu, Lequan Angermann, Quentin Romain, Olivier Rustad, Bjorn Balasingham, Ilangko Pogorelov, Konstantin Choi, Sungbin Debard, Quentin Maier-Hein, Lena Speidel, Stefanie Stoyanov, Danail Brandao, Patrick Cordova, Henry Sánchez Montes, Cristina Gurudu, Suryakanth R. Fernández Esparrach, Glòria Dray, Xavier Liang, Jianming Histace, Aymeric |
| author |
Bernal, Jorge |
| author_facet |
Bernal, Jorge Tajbakhsh, Nima Sánchez, F. Javier Matuszewski, Bogdan J. Chen, Hao Yu, Lequan Angermann, Quentin Romain, Olivier Rustad, Bjorn Balasingham, Ilangko Pogorelov, Konstantin Choi, Sungbin Debard, Quentin Maier-Hein, Lena Speidel, Stefanie Stoyanov, Danail Brandao, Patrick Cordova, Henry Sánchez Montes, Cristina Gurudu, Suryakanth R. Fernández Esparrach, Glòria Dray, Xavier Liang, Jianming Histace, Aymeric |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Tajbakhsh, Nima Sánchez, F. Javier Matuszewski, Bogdan J. Chen, Hao Yu, Lequan Angermann, Quentin Romain, Olivier Rustad, Bjorn Balasingham, Ilangko Pogorelov, Konstantin Choi, Sungbin Debard, Quentin Maier-Hein, Lena Speidel, Stefanie Stoyanov, Danail Brandao, Patrick Cordova, Henry Sánchez Montes, Cristina Gurudu, Suryakanth R. Fernández Esparrach, Glòria Dray, Xavier Liang, Jianming Histace, Aymeric |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Colonoscòpia Càncer colorectal Endoscòpia Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Endoscopy |
| topic |
Colonoscòpia Càncer colorectal Endoscòpia Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Endoscopy |
| description |
Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colon cancer screening though some polyps are still missed, thus preventing early disease detection and treatment. Several computational systems have been proposed to assist polyp detection during colonoscopy but so far without consistent evaluation. The lack of publicly available annotated databases has made it difficult to compare methods and to assess if they achieve performance levels acceptable for clinical use. The Automatic Polyp Detection sub-challenge, conducted as part of the Endoscopic Vision Challenge (http://endovis.grand-challenge.org) at the international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2015, was an effort to address this need. In this paper, we report the results of this comparative evaluation of polyp detection methods, as well as describe additional experiments to further explore differences between methods. We define performance metrics and provide evaluation databases that allow comparison of multiple methodologies. Results show that convolutional neural networks are the state of the art. Nevertheless, it is also demonstrated that combining different methodologies can lead to an improved overall performance. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2018 2018 2018 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/123294 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/2445/123294 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042 IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2017, vol. 36, num. 6, p. 1231-1249 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
(c) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
(c) Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
18 p. application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina) reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869419795985727488 |
| score |
15.812429 |