International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists

Este artículo está sujeto a una licencia CC BY NC ND 4.0

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: San Segundo Fernández, Eugenia
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/353682
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/353682
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Voice quality
Forensic phonetics
Methodologies
Reliability
International survey
Linguistic research
id ES_cd415e55f76ec5ea1bb5c8aac83d0a90
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/353682
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapistsSan Segundo Fernández, EugeniaVoice qualityForensic phoneticsMethodologiesReliabilityInternational surveyLinguistic researchEste artículo está sujeto a una licencia CC BY NC ND 4.0In recent years, numerous investigations have focused on voice quality (VQ) for forensic purposes. These studies notwithstanding, we lack an international picture of how VQ is generally understood by forensic practitioners and how it contrasts with the practices of voice therapists. To fill this gap, a survey was designed and sent to both cohorts: forensicists and clinicians. A total of 45 responses from 20 countries were received. Important differences were found between groups, particularly regarding perceptual assessment. One conclusion to be drawn is that more emphasis should be placed on calibration and error measurement in forensic approaches to VQ. Further collaborations with clinicians should also be encouraged.This research was partly funded by an IAFPA Grant entitled “How to deal with voice quality in forensic phonetics: a feasibility study towards a simplified perceptual protocol” (Award date: April 2016).Peer reviewedUniversidad de BarcelonaSan Segundo Fernández, Eugenia [0000-0002-0127-552X]202420242021info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/353682reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Ingléshttps://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/experimentalphonetics/article/view/43961Noinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3536822026-05-22T06:33:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
title International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
spellingShingle International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
San Segundo Fernández, Eugenia
Voice quality
Forensic phonetics
Methodologies
Reliability
International survey
Linguistic research
title_short International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
title_full International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
title_fullStr International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
title_full_unstemmed International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
title_sort International survey on voice quality: Forensic practitioners versus voice therapists
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv San Segundo Fernández, Eugenia
author San Segundo Fernández, Eugenia
author_facet San Segundo Fernández, Eugenia
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv San Segundo Fernández, Eugenia [0000-0002-0127-552X]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Voice quality
Forensic phonetics
Methodologies
Reliability
International survey
Linguistic research
topic Voice quality
Forensic phonetics
Methodologies
Reliability
International survey
Linguistic research
description Este artículo está sujeto a una licencia CC BY NC ND 4.0
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/353682
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/353682
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/experimentalphonetics/article/view/43961
No
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Barcelona
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Barcelona
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869419793637965824
score 15,81155

Similares en LA Referencia