Global research trends in workplace health promotion, 1983 to 2024: A bibliometric exploration
Background: Initiatives for workplace health promotion (WHP) has gained increasing importance in the face of changing workplace dynamics and new corporate health policies. Understanding how this field has evolved allows us to identify knowledge gaps, guide new research, and strengthen evidence-based...
| Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universidad de Huelva (UHU) |
| Repository: | Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva |
| Language: | English |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ariasmontano.uhu.es:10272/27489 |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10272/27489 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Bibliometric analysis Health promotion Occupational health Public health Working conditions 3212 Salud Publica 3204.03 Salud Profesional |
| Summary: | Background: Initiatives for workplace health promotion (WHP) has gained increasing importance in the face of changing workplace dynamics and new corporate health policies. Understanding how this field has evolved allows us to identify knowledge gaps, guide new research, and strengthen evidence-based organizational interventions. This study aimed to identify existing research gaps, predominant thematic trends, and emerging ideas related to health promotion in the workplace. Methods: A descriptive bibliometric review was conducted on a retrospective database, analyzing relevant scientific literature using quantitative techniques that allow assessing the impact and influence of publications in this field. The database used was Scopus, and data extraction was performed on December 13, 2024. Results: The findings reveal a steady increase in WHP research since 1983, In the field of WHP, 76 countries have participated, reflecting an extensive and diverse global collaboration network. Of these, 29 countries stand out for having produced more than 5 publications each, underscoring their significant contribution to the field. The most frequently used terms, “health promotion,” “occupational health,” and “workplace,” reflect the central focus of this area of study. Conclusions: The study identifies regional gaps and highlights the need for differentiated approaches based on population and context. Furthermore, it confirms the positive impact of occupational health promotion on individuals, organizations, and societies, reinforcing its strategic value globally. Based on the trends detected, future lines of research are proposed to strengthen scientific evidence and practical action in this area. |
|---|