Diagnostic Accuracy, Item Analysis and Age Effects of the UPSIT Spanish Version in Parkinson's Disease

Objective The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is the most commonly used test to detect olfactory impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD), but the cut-off score for clinical purposes is often difficult to establish because of age and sex effects. The current work aims...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Campabadal Delgado, Anna, Segura i Fàbregas, Bàrbara, Baggio, Hugo César, Abós, Alexandra, Uribe, Carme, García Díaz, Anna I., Martí Domènech, Ma. Josep, Valldeoriola Serra, Francesc, Compta, Yaroslau, Bargalló Alabart, Núria, Junqué i Plaja, Carme, 1955-
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/161594
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/161594
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Malaltia de Parkinson
Olfactometria
Malalties neurodegeneratives
Parkinson's disease
Olfactometry
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Descripción
Sumario:Objective The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is the most commonly used test to detect olfactory impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD), but the cut-off score for clinical purposes is often difficult to establish because of age and sex effects. The current work aims to study the sensitivity and specificity of the UPSIT Spanish version and its accuracy in discriminating PD patients at different age groups from healthy controls (HC), and to perform an item analysis. Method Ninety-seven non-demented PD patients and 65 HC were assessed with the UPSIT Spanish version. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for PD were calculated. Multiple regression analysis was used to define predictors of UPSIT scores. Results Using the normative cut-off score for anosmia (≤18), the UPSIT showed a sensitivity of 54.6% with a specificity of 100.0% for PD. We found that, using the UPSIT cut-off score of ≤25, sensitivity was 81.4% and specificity 84.6% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.908). Diagnosis and age were good predictors of UPSIT scores (B = −10.948; p < .001; B = −0.203; p < .001). When optimal cut-off scores were considered according to age ranges (≤60, 61-70, and ≥71), sensitivity and specificity values were >80.0% for all age groups. Conclusions In the Spanish UPSIT version, sensitivity and specificity are improved when specific cut-off scores for different age groups are computed.