Clinical feasibility of quantitative ultrasound texture analysis: A robustness study using fetal lung ultrasound images
OBJECTIVES: To compare the robustness of several methods based on quantitative ultrasound (US) texture analysis to evaluate its feasibility for extracting features from US images to use as a clinical diagnostic tool. METHODS: We compared, ranked, and validated the robustness of 5 texture-based metho...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:2445/125608 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125608 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Ecografia fetal Fetal ultrasonic imaging |
| Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: To compare the robustness of several methods based on quantitative ultrasound (US) texture analysis to evaluate its feasibility for extracting features from US images to use as a clinical diagnostic tool. METHODS: We compared, ranked, and validated the robustness of 5 texture-based methods for extracting textural features from US images acquired under different conditions. For comparison and ranking purposes, we used 13,171 non-US images from widely known available databases (OUTEX [University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland] and PHOTEX [Texture Lab, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland]), which were specifically acquired under different controlled parameters (illumination, resolution, and rotation) from 103 textures. The robustness of those methods with better results from the non-US images was validated by using 666 fetal lung US images acquired from singleton pregnancies. In this study, 2 similarity measurements (correlation and Chebyshev distances) were used to evaluate the repeatability of the features extracted from the same tissue images. RESULTS: Three of the 5 methods (gray-level co-occurrence matrix, local binary patterns, and rotation-invariant local phase quantization) had favorably robust performance when using the non-US database. In fact, these methods showed similarity values close to 0 for the acquisition variations and delineations. Results from the US database confirmed robustness for all of the evaluated methods (gray-level co-occurrence matrix, local binary patterns, and rotation-invariant local phase quantization) when comparing the same texture obtained from different regions of the image (proximal/distal lungs and US machine brand stratification). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed that texture analysis can be robust (high similarity for different condition acquisitions) with potential to be included as a clinical tool. |
|---|