Contribuciones normativas latinoamericanas para la prevención de violaciones masivas a los derechos humanos : el debate de la Responsabilidad de Proteger
At the beginning of the XXI century, it became clear that the world needed to respond more effectively to the mass human rights violations that had been perpetrated by state and non-state actors, but more importantly it was necessary to design and implement mechanisms aimed at establishing truly pre...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis doctoral |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/87801 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/87801 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 343.412(043.2) Crimes against human rights Delitos contra los derechos humanos Derecho penal 5605.05 Derecho Penal |
| Sumario: | At the beginning of the XXI century, it became clear that the world needed to respond more effectively to the mass human rights violations that had been perpetrated by state and non-state actors, but more importantly it was necessary to design and implement mechanisms aimed at establishing truly preventive capabilities not simply reactionary frameworks to counter ongoing war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing. The demand was not new, yet key questions arise in the uncertainty of an international system that at moments seems dominated by national interests of international actors while at other times seems to be defined by shared rules of an international community that seek to maintain relative peace and stability through the enforcement of laws, norms and institutions that constraint unilateral and aggressive behavior of states. Are the political dynamics of our world defined by raw power or by a set rules and norms that condition the behavior of states? What conditions the actions of States within the international system beyond bare national interests? Perceived limitations of their own power and the containment of others, or are they constrained by existing laws and rules that define identities and behavior? Can constructivist theory complement and fill the voids left by realist and neorealist theory regarding the defining aspects of the behavior of state within the international system?... |
|---|