On the Internal Argument(s) of Unaccusative [Verb+Preposition] Structures
In this paper I use the feature [+/–animate] to distinguish unaccusative [verb+preposition] structures where the verb projects the internal argument from structures where the preposition projects the internal argument. On the proposed approach, which aims to be a refinement on the original work by H...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Alicante (UA) |
| Repositorio: | RUA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:rua.ua.es:10045/27462 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10045/27462 http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/raei.2012.25.21 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Unaccusative structures Verb Preposition Internal argument Filología Inglesa |
| Sumario: | In this paper I use the feature [+/–animate] to distinguish unaccusative [verb+preposition] structures where the verb projects the internal argument from structures where the preposition projects the internal argument. On the proposed approach, which aims to be a refinement on the original work by Hoekstra (1988), the preposition selects for the internal argument whenever the latter is [–animate]. The analysis is supported by the observation that unaccusative prepositional structures are typically [–animate], by contrast with their non-prepositional counterparts, and by a principled analysis of the differences existing between sequences with march-type verbs vs. sequences with verbs like whistle or eat. By contrast with current works in the literature, the preposition is argued to project two Spec positions in eat-type sequences, and a pP-shell configuration is proposed to match the derivation of unaccusative [verb+preposition] structures that feature one or two arguments internal to the prepositional projection. |
|---|