Switching to lopinavir/ritonavir with or without abacavir/lamivudine in lipoatrophic patients treated with zidovudine/abacavir/lamivudine

Discontinuation of thymidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tNRTIs) is the only proven strategy for improving lipoatrophy. It is unclear whether switching to NRTI-sparing or to non-thymidine NRTI-containing therapy has differential effects on body fat recovery. This was a 96 week, open...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bernardino, JI, Pulido, F, Martinez, E, Arrizabalaga, J, Domingo, P, Portilla, J, Ocampo, A, Munoz, J, Torres, R, Arribas, JR
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2013
Country:España
Institution:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repository:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p9838
Online Access:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=9838
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:HIV
lipoatrophy
thymidine nucleoside analogues
NRTI-sparing regimen
lopinavir
ritonavir monotherapy
Description
Summary:Discontinuation of thymidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tNRTIs) is the only proven strategy for improving lipoatrophy. It is unclear whether switching to NRTI-sparing or to non-thymidine NRTI-containing therapy has differential effects on body fat recovery. This was a 96 week, open-label, randomized study in suppressed patients with moderate/severe lipoatrophy and no prior virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor and who had their triple NRTI regimen (zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir) switched to lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine for a 1 month run-in period and then randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine versus lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. The KRETA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00865007). Of 95 patients included, 88 were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine (n44) or lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n44). Median (IQR) baseline limb fat was 2.5 (1.63.7) kg in the lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine group and 2.5 (2.05.4) kg in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group. Six patients in the triple therapy group and 13 in the monotherapy group had discontinued study drugs by week 96. Although there were limb fat gains in each group at weeks 48/96 (324/358 g in lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine, P0.09/0.07, versus 215/416 g in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group, P0.28/0.16), differences between groups were not significant [difference 109 g (95 CI 442, 660)/57 g (95 CI 740, 625)]. In lipoatrophic patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir, switching to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy had no additional benefit in limb fat recovery relative to switching to lopinavir/ritonavir with abacavir/lamivudine. These data suggest that non-thymidine nucleosides such as abacavir/lamivudine are not an obstacle to limb fat recovery.