What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study

Although spending time in nature can improve subjective wellbeing (SWB), little is known about how different types of nature exposure are associated with different dimensions of SWB or the consistency of associations across national/cultural contexts. Using data from 18 countries, associations betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: McDougall, Craig W., Elliott, Lewis R., White, Mathew P., Grellier, James, Bell, Simon, Bratman, Gregory N., Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J., Lima, Maria L., Ojala, Ann, Cirach, Marta, Roiko, Anne, van den Bosch, Matilda A., Fleming, Lora E.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/69162
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/69162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102479
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Nature
Blue space
Public health
Life satisfaction
Happiness
id ES_c5ea52232500ce6695ad2c2f2df43cab
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/69162
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country studyMcDougall, Craig W.Elliott, Lewis R.White, Mathew P.Grellier, JamesBell, SimonBratman, Gregory N.Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.Lima, Maria L.Ojala, AnnCirach, MartaRoiko, Annevan den Bosch, Matilda A.Fleming, Lora E.NatureBlue spacePublic healthLife satisfactionHappinessAlthough spending time in nature can improve subjective wellbeing (SWB), little is known about how different types of nature exposure are associated with different dimensions of SWB or the consistency of associations across national/cultural contexts. Using data from 18 countries, associations between green, coastal and freshwater blue space exposures (including residential availability, visits ‘yesterday’ and visits in the previous four weeks) and hedonic, eudaimonic, and evaluative wellbeing were estimated. Overall, residential nature availability showed little association with any wellbeing outcome, whereas visiting green and coastal locations ‘yesterday’ was associated with better hedonic wellbeing. Although frequently visiting green, coastal and freshwater spaces were all associated with greater evaluative wellbeing, greater eudaimonic wellbeing was only associated with frequent visits to green and freshwater spaces. Variations existed across countries. Results suggest that different types of nature exposure vary in their association with different dimensions of SWB. Understanding these differences may help us maximise the potential of natural environments as SWB-promoting resources.This project received support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 666773 (BlueHealth). MvdB and MN acknowledge support from the grant CEX2018-000806-S funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program.The funders had no role in the conceptualisation, design, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.Data collection in California was supported by the Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University. Data collection in Canada was supported by the Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia. Data collection in Finland was supported by the Natural Resources Institute Finland. Data collection in Australia was supported by Griffith University and the University of the Sunshine Coast. Data collection in Portugal was supported by ISCTE—University Institute of Lisbon. Data collection in Ireland was supported by the Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland. Data collection in Hong Kong was supported by an internal University of Exeter—Chinese University of Hong Kong international collaboration fund.Elsevier202520252024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/69162http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102479reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésJournal of Environmental Psychology. 2024;100:102479info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/666773© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/691622026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
title What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
spellingShingle What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
McDougall, Craig W.
Nature
Blue space
Public health
Life satisfaction
Happiness
title_short What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
title_full What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
title_fullStr What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
title_full_unstemmed What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
title_sort What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv McDougall, Craig W.
Elliott, Lewis R.
White, Mathew P.
Grellier, James
Bell, Simon
Bratman, Gregory N.
Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
Lima, Maria L.
Ojala, Ann
Cirach, Marta
Roiko, Anne
van den Bosch, Matilda A.
Fleming, Lora E.
author McDougall, Craig W.
author_facet McDougall, Craig W.
Elliott, Lewis R.
White, Mathew P.
Grellier, James
Bell, Simon
Bratman, Gregory N.
Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
Lima, Maria L.
Ojala, Ann
Cirach, Marta
Roiko, Anne
van den Bosch, Matilda A.
Fleming, Lora E.
author_role author
author2 Elliott, Lewis R.
White, Mathew P.
Grellier, James
Bell, Simon
Bratman, Gregory N.
Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
Lima, Maria L.
Ojala, Ann
Cirach, Marta
Roiko, Anne
van den Bosch, Matilda A.
Fleming, Lora E.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Nature
Blue space
Public health
Life satisfaction
Happiness
topic Nature
Blue space
Public health
Life satisfaction
Happiness
description Although spending time in nature can improve subjective wellbeing (SWB), little is known about how different types of nature exposure are associated with different dimensions of SWB or the consistency of associations across national/cultural contexts. Using data from 18 countries, associations between green, coastal and freshwater blue space exposures (including residential availability, visits ‘yesterday’ and visits in the previous four weeks) and hedonic, eudaimonic, and evaluative wellbeing were estimated. Overall, residential nature availability showed little association with any wellbeing outcome, whereas visiting green and coastal locations ‘yesterday’ was associated with better hedonic wellbeing. Although frequently visiting green, coastal and freshwater spaces were all associated with greater evaluative wellbeing, greater eudaimonic wellbeing was only associated with frequent visits to green and freshwater spaces. Variations existed across countries. Results suggest that different types of nature exposure vary in their association with different dimensions of SWB. Understanding these differences may help us maximise the potential of natural environments as SWB-promoting resources.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2025
2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/69162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102479
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/69162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102479
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2024;100:102479
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/666773
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869419029022638080
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia