Blood, Sweat, and Research: Menstruation’s Impact on Fieldwork in Natural Science
In this article, we examine the often-overlooked impact of menstruation on fieldwork experiences in natural sciences disciplines. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 429 participants, predominantly women (86.0%) with limited non-binary representation and no transgender men, to investigate the l...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/122381 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/122381 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 618.17-008.8:55-05 Diversity Equity Gender Hygiene Menstrual health Survey Diversidad Encuesta Equidad Género Higiene Salud menstrual Ciencias 25 Ciencias de la Tierra y del Espacio |
| Sumario: | In this article, we examine the often-overlooked impact of menstruation on fieldwork experiences in natural sciences disciplines. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 429 participants, predominantly women (86.0%) with limited non-binary representation and no transgender men, to investigate the logistical, social, and health-related challenges faced during fieldwork. The survey, combining quantitative and qualitative data, revealed that 86% of respondents have experienced menstruation, with nearly half (48%) reporting significant menstrual pain while working in the field. Quantitative findings indicate that fieldwork logistics rarely accommodate menstrual health needs: 85% of participants reported that standard first aid kits do not include menstrual hygiene products. Additionally, qualitative data highlighted difficulties in communication about menstrual issues, with only 30.5% of respondents feeling comfortable discussing these issues with male supervisors, compared to 59.9% with female supervisors. These findings underscore significant gaps in support for menstrual health during fieldwork. They suggest that practical measures—such as ensuring menstrual products are available in first aid kits and fostering more open dialogue about menstrual health—could improve support for menstruating researchers. However, our results also highlight the need for further research to explore the broader systemic factors underlying these challenges. Ultimately, addressing these gaps may contribute to creating a more inclusive and equitable environment for all researchers. |
|---|