Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations

The present document aims to analyze different types of Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries and define which type is more suitable for a specific location, regarding the SOH (State of Health) value after one year of operation. Three batteries have been chosen for this comparison, each one having a differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Diaz Hernandez, Camilo Angel
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/109080
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/109080
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Lithium ion batteries
Bateries d'ió liti
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies
id ES_c3781aaa298684b6f2f99ff4daee75da
oai_identifier_str oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/109080
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locationsDiaz Hernandez, Camilo AngelLithium ion batteriesBateries d'ió litiÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::EnergiesThe present document aims to analyze different types of Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries and define which type is more suitable for a specific location, regarding the SOH (State of Health) value after one year of operation. Three batteries have been chosen for this comparison, each one having a different performance according with mathematical models with different parameters. Two models are based in the Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) chemistry; with the difference that the Model 3 uses a carbon coated LiFePO4. The model 2 is based on the Lithium Manganese Nickel Oxide (LiNiMnCoO2, known as NMC) chemistry. These models were selected based on the existing studies available in the literature (many models have been developed for these types of Li-ion), and most importantly, the LiFePO4 used to be the most used type of battery for electrical vehicles and nowadays the NMC is becoming the new trend. LiFePO4 is used in many electric cars manufactured in China and NMC is a type used in very popular brands such as Tesla. For each one of the models, the SOH calculation is presented and each equation is developed according with the temperatures at three different locations: Oslo, Norway; Barcelona, Spain and New Jersey in the US. For these places, the temperatures were considered and configured into the models. The trail period was a year, and as the temperatures were for the year 2016, the total cycle number was set to 366. Results showed that the temperature plays a significant role in terms of the SOH rate of change per cycle. Even though the final SOH value is not significantly changing for the same model at different location, the set of values that the SOH takes is totally different. After analyzing the graphs obtained, a modification was followed in order to consider the real cases, where the mileage driven is not constant and is different at the three locations. Then a higher difference in the SOH was identified comparing each place. At the end, a market analysis is presented in order to estimate the annualized cost at each place for each one of the three models. The cost-benefit is also a key indicator while making the decision of the most suitable battery. It can be concluded that using a battery outside the optimal temperature value then can decrease its lifetime in the range of 1 to 3% only due to this variable.Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaLlorca Piqué, Jordi20172017-06-1520172017-10-24master thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccNAhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2117/109080reponame:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPCinstname:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/1090802026-05-27T15:37:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
title Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
spellingShingle Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
Diaz Hernandez, Camilo Angel
Lithium ion batteries
Bateries d'ió liti
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies
title_short Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
title_full Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
title_fullStr Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
title_full_unstemmed Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
title_sort Benchmark analysis of lithium-ion batteries at different locations
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Diaz Hernandez, Camilo Angel
author Diaz Hernandez, Camilo Angel
author_facet Diaz Hernandez, Camilo Angel
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Llorca Piqué, Jordi
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Lithium ion batteries
Bateries d'ió liti
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies
topic Lithium ion batteries
Bateries d'ió liti
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Energies
description The present document aims to analyze different types of Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries and define which type is more suitable for a specific location, regarding the SOH (State of Health) value after one year of operation. Three batteries have been chosen for this comparison, each one having a different performance according with mathematical models with different parameters. Two models are based in the Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) chemistry; with the difference that the Model 3 uses a carbon coated LiFePO4. The model 2 is based on the Lithium Manganese Nickel Oxide (LiNiMnCoO2, known as NMC) chemistry. These models were selected based on the existing studies available in the literature (many models have been developed for these types of Li-ion), and most importantly, the LiFePO4 used to be the most used type of battery for electrical vehicles and nowadays the NMC is becoming the new trend. LiFePO4 is used in many electric cars manufactured in China and NMC is a type used in very popular brands such as Tesla. For each one of the models, the SOH calculation is presented and each equation is developed according with the temperatures at three different locations: Oslo, Norway; Barcelona, Spain and New Jersey in the US. For these places, the temperatures were considered and configured into the models. The trail period was a year, and as the temperatures were for the year 2016, the total cycle number was set to 366. Results showed that the temperature plays a significant role in terms of the SOH rate of change per cycle. Even though the final SOH value is not significantly changing for the same model at different location, the set of values that the SOH takes is totally different. After analyzing the graphs obtained, a modification was followed in order to consider the real cases, where the mileage driven is not constant and is different at the three locations. Then a higher difference in the SOH was identified comparing each place. At the end, a market analysis is presented in order to estimate the annualized cost at each place for each one of the three models. The cost-benefit is also a key indicator while making the decision of the most suitable battery. It can be concluded that using a battery outside the optimal temperature value then can decrease its lifetime in the range of 1 to 3% only due to this variable.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-06-15
2017
2017-10-24
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv master thesis
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
NA
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2117/109080
url https://hdl.handle.net/2117/109080
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
instname:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
instname_str Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
reponame_str UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
collection UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869418798395686912
score 15.301603

Similares en LA Referencia