What Works in Peer Support for Breast Cancer Survivors: a Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography

Breast cancer is associated with adverse physical and psychological consequences. Although research has identified the various benefits linked to psychosocial interventions, mixed results have been found in relation to peer support. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-ethnography is to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Clougher, Derek, Ciria Suárez, Laura, Medina Alcaraz, Juan Carlos, Anastasiadou, Dimitra, Racioppi, Anna, Ochoa Arnedo, Cristian
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
OAI Identifier:oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/211520
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/211520
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Càncer de mama
Oncologia
Revisions mèdiques
Breast cancer
Oncology
Periodic health examinations
Descripción
Sumario:Breast cancer is associated with adverse physical and psychological consequences. Although research has identified the various benefits linked to psychosocial interventions, mixed results have been found in relation to peer support. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-ethnography is to explore the qualitative evidence on the experience of breast cancer survivors in peer support. A systematic search of the literature was conducted until June 2023, and a metaethnographic approach was used to synthesize the included papers. Eleven articles were included, collecting the experience of 345 participants. The following four core areas involved in peer support implementation were identified from the synthesis: Peer support can create understanding and a mutual therapeutic and emotional connection; peer support can facilitate an educational and supportive patient-centered journey; peer support should monitor group members for unpleasant emotional experiences; peer support should have professional supervision of recruitment and training to prioritize quality. These results can be used as patient-centered insights by healthcare professionals to provide evidence-informed peer support programs and address current limitations in the field.