Comparative Study of Refraction between Wave Front-Based Refraction and Autorefraction without and with Cycloplegia in Children and Adolescents

The main aim of this study was to compare refraction measurements with and without cycloplegia from two refractors devices, (TRK-2P autorefractometer (TRK-2P) and wavefront-based refraction Visionix 130 (VX130)) in children and adolescents. This descriptive observational study included 20 myopic eye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Calvo Maroto, Ana M., Llorente González, Sara, Bezunartea bezunartea, Jaione, Hurtado Ceña, Francisco Javier, Berrozpe Villabona, Clara, Bilbao Malavé, Valentina, Piñero, David P., Barrio Barrio, Jesús, Recalde Maestre, Sergio
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/183117
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/183117
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Refracció ocular
Infants
Adolescents
Eye refraction
Children
Teenagers
Descripción
Sumario:The main aim of this study was to compare refraction measurements with and without cycloplegia from two refractors devices, (TRK-2P autorefractometer (TRK-2P) and wavefront-based refraction Visionix 130 (VX130)) in children and adolescents. This descriptive observational study included 20 myopic eyes and 40 hyperopic eyes measured in two different Spanish hospitals. Cycloplegia was carried out by three drops of cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% (Colircusi cycloplegic, Alcon Healthcare S.A., Barcelona). The mean age of the myopia group was 12.40 +/- 3.48 years; for the hyperopia group, the mean age was 7.37 +/- 2.47 years. In the myopia group, autorefraction and wavefront-based refraction did not show clinically significant differences in any components between with and without cycloplegia. The hyperopia group showed statistical and clinically significant differences in sphere and SE components between relaxed and non-relaxed states of accommodation, although the cylindrical components were not clinically different. In this study, we considered a value of >= 0.50D as a clinically significant difference in refraction. Therefore, both devices were capable of obtaining accurate refractions without cyclopegia in myopia children, although they did not avoid instrument myopia and accommodation involved in hyperopia children. Moreover, both refractometers could be useful for astigmatism monitoring in children without the need for cycloplegic drops.