Recomendaciones sobre el uso de la telemedicina aplicada a la patología nutricional
[Abstract] Introduction: telemedicine can improve the standards of clinical care and use of resources. The COVID-19 pandemic has required its implementation in routine practice. For this reason, a group of endocrinologists from Valencia, Murcia and the Balearic Islands created a committee for its de...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears |
| Repositório: | Docusalut |
| Idioma: | espanhol |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/18555 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/18555 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Pandemics Nutrition Disorders Telemedicine Delphi Technique Humans COVID-19 Quality Indicators, Health Care Trastornos Nutricionales Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud Humanos Telemedicina Técnica Delfos Pandemias |
| Resumo: | [Abstract] Introduction: telemedicine can improve the standards of clinical care and use of resources. The COVID-19 pandemic has required its implementation in routine practice. For this reason, a group of endocrinologists from Valencia, Murcia and the Balearic Islands created a committee for its development. Objectives: to establish recommendations in order to improve the quality of consultation in nutritional disorders, and to create indicators for its management. Methodology: the Delphi methodology was followed with the participation of 13 professionals in order to reach the widest consensus. A 16-item questionnaire was distributed within 3 rounds: in the first round, the degree of consensus was established; in the second round, the participants responded to the posed questions after having access to the first-round results. Agreement was considered if ≥ 75 % participants reached consensus, while strong agreement was considered if consensus was reached by ≥ 90 %. In addition, quality indicators were established. In a third round, these indicators were developed. Results: after 3 rounds and a revision 5 recommendations with strong agreement were established based on organizational aspects. Regarding administrative aspects, 6 recommendations with strong agreement were established while 4 recommendations reached the level of agreement. Eight quality indicators were selected and developed. Conclusions: this document compiles a list of recommendations about needs and requirements to be taken into account for a quality telematic consultation in patients with nutritional disorders. In addition, health care quality indicators have been created and developed. |
|---|