Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback

Plasticity is one of the most important physiological mechanisms underlying motor recovery from brain lesions. Rehabilitation methods, such as mirror visual feedback therapy, which are based on multisensory integration of motor, cognitive, and perceptual processes, are considered effective methods t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Kumru, Hatice, Albu, Sergiu, Pelayo, Raúl, Rothwell, John, Opisso, Eloy, León, Daniel, Soler, María Dolors, Tormos Muñoz, José María
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:España
Institución:Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
Repositorio:RIUCV. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riucv.ucv.es:20.500.12466/3922
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12466/3922
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Plasticity
Cortex
2490.01 Neurofisiología
2490 Neurociencias
id ES_c256bf2fbbf2e47696888071fc52ee7d
oai_identifier_str oai:riucv.ucv.es:20.500.12466/3922
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual FeedbackKumru, HaticeAlbu, SergiuPelayo, RaúlRothwell, JohnOpisso, EloyLeón, DanielSoler, María DolorsTormos Muñoz, José MaríaPlasticityCortex2490.01 Neurofisiología2490 NeurocienciasPlasticity is one of the most important physiological mechanisms underlying motor recovery from brain lesions. Rehabilitation methods, such as mirror visual feedback therapy, which are based on multisensory integration of motor, cognitive, and perceptual processes, are considered effective methods to induce cortical reorganization. The present study investigated 3 different types of visual feedback (direct, mirrored, and blocked visual feedback: DVF, MVF, and BVF, resp. ) on M1 cortex excitability and intracortical inhibition/facilitation at rest and during phasic unimanual motor task in 11 healthy individuals. The excitability of the ipsilateral M1 cortex and the intracortical facilitation increased during motor task performance in the DVF and MVF but not in the BVF condition. In addition, MVF induced cortical disinhibition of the ipsilateral hemisphere to the index finger performing the motor task, which was greater when compared to the BVF and restricted to the homologue first dorsal interosseous muscle. The visual feedback is relevant to M1 cortex excitability modulation but the MVF plays a crucial role in promoting changes in intracortical inhibition in comparison to BVF. Altogether, it can be concluded that a combination of motor training with MVF therapy may induce more robust neuroplastic changes through multisensory integration that is relevant to motor rehabilitation.20242024-02-0720162016-01-0120162016-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12466/3922reponame:RIUCV. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártirinstname:Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente MártirInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Atribución 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:riucv.ucv.es:20.500.12466/39222026-06-19T08:32:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
title Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
spellingShingle Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
Kumru, Hatice
Plasticity
Cortex
2490.01 Neurofisiología
2490 Neurociencias
title_short Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
title_full Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
title_fullStr Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
title_full_unstemmed Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
title_sort Motor Cortex Plasticity during Unilateral Finger Movement with Mirror Visual Feedback
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kumru, Hatice
Albu, Sergiu
Pelayo, Raúl
Rothwell, John
Opisso, Eloy
León, Daniel
Soler, María Dolors
Tormos Muñoz, José María
author Kumru, Hatice
author_facet Kumru, Hatice
Albu, Sergiu
Pelayo, Raúl
Rothwell, John
Opisso, Eloy
León, Daniel
Soler, María Dolors
Tormos Muñoz, José María
author_role author
author2 Albu, Sergiu
Pelayo, Raúl
Rothwell, John
Opisso, Eloy
León, Daniel
Soler, María Dolors
Tormos Muñoz, José María
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Plasticity
Cortex
2490.01 Neurofisiología
2490 Neurociencias
topic Plasticity
Cortex
2490.01 Neurofisiología
2490 Neurociencias
description Plasticity is one of the most important physiological mechanisms underlying motor recovery from brain lesions. Rehabilitation methods, such as mirror visual feedback therapy, which are based on multisensory integration of motor, cognitive, and perceptual processes, are considered effective methods to induce cortical reorganization. The present study investigated 3 different types of visual feedback (direct, mirrored, and blocked visual feedback: DVF, MVF, and BVF, resp. ) on M1 cortex excitability and intracortical inhibition/facilitation at rest and during phasic unimanual motor task in 11 healthy individuals. The excitability of the ipsilateral M1 cortex and the intracortical facilitation increased during motor task performance in the DVF and MVF but not in the BVF condition. In addition, MVF induced cortical disinhibition of the ipsilateral hemisphere to the index finger performing the motor task, which was greater when compared to the BVF and restricted to the homologue first dorsal interosseous muscle. The visual feedback is relevant to M1 cortex excitability modulation but the MVF plays a crucial role in promoting changes in intracortical inhibition in comparison to BVF. Altogether, it can be concluded that a combination of motor training with MVF therapy may induce more robust neuroplastic changes through multisensory integration that is relevant to motor rehabilitation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-01-01
2016
2016-01-01
2024
2024-02-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12466/3922
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12466/3922
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RIUCV. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
instname:Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
instname_str Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
reponame_str RIUCV. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
collection RIUCV. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869418657541521408
score 15,300724

Similares en LA Referencia