Values of tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging for a surgical approach to endometrial cancer

Objective: To analyze the relationship between tumor volume in Endometrial Cancer (EC) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and lymph node metastasis to establish which patients benefit from omitting the lymphadenectomy. Methods: A retrospective observational study with 194 patients with EC identifie...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: López González, Elga, Rodríguez Jiménez, Alberto, Rojas Luna, José Antonio, Daza Manzano, Cinta, Gómez Salgado, Juan
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Huelva (UHU)
Repositorio:Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ariasmontano.uhu.es:10272/23922
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10272/23922
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Endometrial cancer
Lymph node metastases
Lymphadenectomy
MRI
Tumor volume
32 Ciencias Médicas
Descrição
Resumo:Objective: To analyze the relationship between tumor volume in Endometrial Cancer (EC) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and lymph node metastasis to establish which patients benefit from omitting the lymphadenectomy. Methods: A retrospective observational study with 194 patients with EC identified between 2016 and 2021 at the Juan Ramón Jiménez University Hospital, Huelva (Spain) was carried out. Preoperative MRI of 127 patients was assessed. The tumor volume was analyzed on MRI by the ellipsoid formula and another alternative method with a manual ROI in different sections. Risk factors for node metastases were analyzed to understand its relationship and to identify an optimum criterion for the tailored surgery. Results: Univariate analysis showed risk factors for lymph node metastases were histological grade (p = 0.001), tumor with a volume greater than >25 cm3 (p < 0.001), lymphovascular space invaded (p = 0.007), and preoperative Ca 125 serum >28 (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor volume index >25 cm3 was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastases. The patients without significant proposed risk factors (volume index >25 cm3 [OR = 0.64], Ca 125 > 28 [OR = 0.32], and high histological grade [OR = 2.6]) did not present lymph node metastases, independent of myometrial invasion. Conclusions: Lymphadenectomy can be omitted in patients with Endometrioid carcinoma that do not have any of the following risk factors: high-grade tumor, elevated Ca 125 (>28), and tumor volume on MRI greater than 25 cm3 . Tumor volume might predict the state of lymph nodes in EC and it could give information regarding surgical management.