Beta-blockers after invasively managed STEMI vs NSTEMI without reduced ejection fraction: a prespecified analysis from the REBOOT trial.
Recent trials have questioned the clinical benefit of beta-blockers in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, differences in pathophysiology and risk profile between MI with and without ST-segment elevation (STEMI and NSTEMI) may i...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) |
| Repositorio: | Repisalud |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:repisalud__::9e3b9a705da2414a497e34c3243ade62 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12105/27446 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Acute coronary syndrome Beta-blockers Bloqueadores beta Ensayo clínico aleatorizado IAMCEST IAMSEST NSTEMI Randomized controlled trial STEMI Síndrome coronario agudo |
| Sumario: | Recent trials have questioned the clinical benefit of beta-blockers in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, differences in pathophysiology and risk profile between MI with and without ST-segment elevation (STEMI and NSTEMI) may influence the effect of beta-blockers. In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the REBOOT trial, which randomized invasively managed MI patients with LVEF > 40% to beta-blockers or control, we evaluated differences in long-term effects of the intervention between STEMI (n = 4296) and NSTEMI (n = 4142). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, reinfarction, or heart failure hospitalization over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. |
|---|