Interregionalism, trade and standardization: the long road to the EU-MERCOSUR trade agreement and the uncertainties ahead

The European Union and the Common Market of the South reached a political accord for a free trade agreement in 2019. This chapter assesses the definitional and normative content of trade facilitation and intellectual property rights therein. Both policy areas are regulated in reference to internatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Bianculli, Andrea C.
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/60118
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197681886.003.0008
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:European Union
Health
Intellectual property
Interregionalism
MERCOSUR
Regulatory governance
Standardization
Trade
Trade facilitation
Trade negotiations
Descripción
Sumario:The European Union and the Common Market of the South reached a political accord for a free trade agreement in 2019. This chapter assesses the definitional and normative content of trade facilitation and intellectual property rights therein. Both policy areas are regulated in reference to international rules and standards as set by the World Trade Organization agreements. Yet, they equally evince the articulation of novel definitional and standardization materials. This is the case for transparency, participation, and the involvement of the business community in trade facilitation. In intellectual property, these relate to an explicit commitment to advancing economic and social welfare, and a clear public interest dimension, especially around patents and health. Ideational and institutional elements account for these noteworthy outcomes. Whereas the first refer to how ideas and discourse evolve in trade regulations and standards, the second variable underscores the relevance of history, thus emphasizing interregionalism as a process, where context and time are essential.