Role of primary care in the follow-up of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea undergoing CPAP treatment: a randomised controlled trial

Objective: To evaluate whether follow-up of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) undergoing CPAP treatment could be performed in primary care (PC) settings.Design: Non-inferiority, randomised, prospective controlled study.Settings: Sleep unit (SU) at the University Hospital and in 8 PC units...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sánchez de la Torre, Manuel, Nadal, N., Cortijo Fernández, Anunciación, Masa Jiménez, Juan Fernando, Durán Cantolla, Joaquín, Valls, Joan, Serra, S., Sánchez de la Torre, Alicia, Gracia, M., Ferrer, F., Lorente, I., Urgeles, M. C., Tomás, A., Fuentes, A., Amengol, F., Lumbierres, M., Vázquez Polo, Francisco José, Barbé Illa, Ferran
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2015
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Repositorio:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
OAI Identifier:oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/41121
Acceso en línea:http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000350983500010&KeyUID=WOS:000350983500010
https://hdl.handle.net/10578/41121
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Compliance
CPAP treatment
Obstructive sleep apnoea
OSA
Primary care
Randomised controlled trial
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To evaluate whether follow-up of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) undergoing CPAP treatment could be performed in primary care (PC) settings.Design: Non-inferiority, randomised, prospective controlled study.Settings: Sleep unit (SU) at the University Hospital and in 8 PC units in Lleida, Spain.Participants: Patients with OSA were randomised to be followed up at the SU or PC units over a 6-month period.Main outcomes measured: The primary outcome was CPAP compliance at 6 months. The secondary outcomes were Epworth Sleep Scale (ESS) score, EuroQoL, patient satisfaction, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure and cost-effectiveness.Results: We included 101 patients in PC ((mean±SD) apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) 50.8±22.9/h, age 56.2±11 years, 74% male) and 109 in the SU (AHI 51.4±24.4/h, age 55.8±11 years, 77% male)). The CPAP compliance was (mean (95% CI) 4.94 (4.47 to 5.5) vs 5.23 (4.79 to 5.66) h, p=0.18) in PC and SU groups, respectively. In the SU group, there were greater improvements in ESS scores (mean change 1.79, 95% CI +0.05 to +3.53, p=0.04) and patient satisfaction (-1.49, 95% CI -2.22 to -0.76); there was a significant mean difference in BMI between the groups (0.57, 95% CI +0.01 to +1.13, p=0.04). In the PC setting, there was a cost saving of 60%, with similar effectiveness, as well as a decrease in systolic blood pressure (-5.32; 95% CI -10.91 to +0.28, p=0.06).Conclusions: For patients with OSA, treatment provided in a PC setting did not result in worse CPAP compliance compared with a specialist model and was shown to be a cost-effective alternative.Trial registration number: Clinical Trials NCT01918449.Keywords: Sleep apnoea.

Similares en LA Referencia