Quality of care indicators for benign prostatic hyperplasia. A qualitative study

Objective: To assess quality of care indicators for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses for incorporation into health information systems. Design: Structured expert meeting, using procedures adapted from the nominal group techniques and the Rand consens...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Navarro-Pérez J, Peiró S, Brotons-Muntó F, López-Alcina E, Real-Romaguera A
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2014
País:España
Recursos:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p5227
Acesso em linha:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/5227
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Lower urinary tract syndrome
Quality indicators
Consensus methods
Descrição
Resumo:Objective: To assess quality of care indicators for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses for incorporation into health information systems. Design: Structured expert meeting, using procedures adapted from the nominal group techniques and the Rand consensus method. Setting: Valencian School of Health Studies. Participants and/or contexts: Forty panellists (74% doctors, 70% from primary care settings) with experience in the management of BPH from 15 departments of the Valencia Health Agency. Method: Three workshops were held simultaneously (examination and diagnosis, drug therapy, and appropriateness and results), and the 15 quality indicators selected by the coordination group were assessed. Results: Eleven of the 15 indicators scored in the range of high relevance. The 5 best rated were: the use of alpha-blockers + 5-alpha reductase inhibitor from certain severity level, digital rectal examination in the initial assessment, follow-up with the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), the rate of urgent catheterization in Hospital Accident Et Emergency Units, initial assessment with the IPSS and the use of alpha-blockers prior to catheter removal for acute retention of urine. Conclusions: Some of the assessed indicators can be useful for incorporation into health information systems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.