Optimization of thin film-microextraction (TF-SPME) method in order to determine musts volatile compounds
It is well known that grape aromatic composition is directly correlated to the final wine quality. To determine this composition, a previous stage of selective extraction is necessary, since the aromatic compounds are found in very low concentrations in the grapes. Therefore, in this work, the thin...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/287747 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/287747 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | TF-SPME Optimization Extraction Comparison Grape aroma PDMS/CAR and PDMS/DVB absorbents |
| Sumario: | It is well known that grape aromatic composition is directly correlated to the final wine quality. To determine this composition, a previous stage of selective extraction is necessary, since the aromatic compounds are found in very low concentrations in the grapes. Therefore, in this work, the thin film microextraction technique (TF-SPME) was optimized, for first time, with the aim to analyze the volatile composition of the grape musts. The results obtained with the two commercially available absorbent materials for TF-SPME, polydimethylsiloxane/carboxene (PDMS/CAR) and PDMS/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB), were optimized and compared. To carry out the optimization, a randomized factorial design was performed combining the following factors and levels: extraction mode (headspace (HS), or direct immersion (DI)), stirring speed (500 and 1000 rpm), extraction time (1, 3 and 6 h), and extraction temperature (20, 40 and 60 °C). After performing a principal component analysis (PCA) and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) multifactorial, it was concluded that the best conditions for TF-SPME with PDMS/CAR were: direct immersion (DI), 500 rpm, 6 h, and 20 °C, while for TF-SPME with PDMS/DVB no conditions were found that maximized the extraction of most compounds, therefore compromise conditions were chosen: headspace (HS), 500 rpm, 6 h, and 40 °C. Finally, the comparison between the results obtained with both absorbents indicated that the absorbent that extracted better the volatile compounds from the musts with the TF-SPME technique, was PDMS/CAR, under the conditions: direct immersion (DI), 500 rpm, 6 h, and 20 °C. |
|---|