Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates

Two aluminum multilayer laminates have been processed by hot roll bonding following similar processing paths. The first one is constituted by alternated Al 2024 and Al 1050 layers (ALH19) and the second one by alternated Al 7075 and Al 1050 layers (ADH19). The influence of the constituent materials...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Cepeda-Jiménez, C.M., Hidalgo, P., Pozuelo, M., Ruano, Oscar Antonio, Carreño, Fernando
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2010
País:España
Recursos:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/43748
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43748
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Aluminum alloys
Multilayers
Thermomechanical processing
Microstructure
Mechanical properties
id ES_bbf47d2c465e72953aa129a830d76259
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/43748
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminatesCepeda-Jiménez, C.M.Hidalgo, P.Pozuelo, M.Ruano, Oscar AntonioCarreño, FernandoAluminum alloysMultilayersThermomechanical processingMicrostructureMechanical propertiesTwo aluminum multilayer laminates have been processed by hot roll bonding following similar processing paths. The first one is constituted by alternated Al 2024 and Al 1050 layers (ALH19) and the second one by alternated Al 7075 and Al 1050 layers (ADH19). The influence of the constituent materials in the multilayer laminates both during the processing at high temperature, and during the subsequent mechanical characterization has been analyzed. The mechanical behavior of the as-received materials at the processing conditions has been characterized by hot torsion. Multilayer laminates have been tested at room temperature under impact Charpy tests, three-point bend tests and shear tests on the interfaces. The relative toughness increase compared to the constituent materials was much higher for the ADH19 laminate based on high strength Al 7075 alloy than for the ALH19 laminate. This is attributed to the different fracture mechanism.Financial support from CICYT (Project MAT2003-01172 and MAT2006-11202) is gratefully acknowledged. C.M. Cepeda-Jiménez thanks the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) for a I3P contract. We also thank L. del Real-Alarcón for the welding work, F.F. González-Rodríguez for assistance during hot rolling and J. Chao- Hermida for assistance with the Charpy impact test. Finally, an especial mention in memory of P.J. González-Aparicio for his help and assistance with electron microscopy during all these years is made.Peer reviewedSpringer Nature201120112010info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43748reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Ingléshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-0069-xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/437482026-05-22T06:33:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
title Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
spellingShingle Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
Cepeda-Jiménez, C.M.
Aluminum alloys
Multilayers
Thermomechanical processing
Microstructure
Mechanical properties
title_short Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
title_full Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
title_fullStr Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
title_full_unstemmed Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
title_sort Influence of constituent materials on the impact toughness and fracture mechanisms of hot roll-bonded aluminum multilayer laminates
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cepeda-Jiménez, C.M.
Hidalgo, P.
Pozuelo, M.
Ruano, Oscar Antonio
Carreño, Fernando
author Cepeda-Jiménez, C.M.
author_facet Cepeda-Jiménez, C.M.
Hidalgo, P.
Pozuelo, M.
Ruano, Oscar Antonio
Carreño, Fernando
author_role author
author2 Hidalgo, P.
Pozuelo, M.
Ruano, Oscar Antonio
Carreño, Fernando
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Aluminum alloys
Multilayers
Thermomechanical processing
Microstructure
Mechanical properties
topic Aluminum alloys
Multilayers
Thermomechanical processing
Microstructure
Mechanical properties
description Two aluminum multilayer laminates have been processed by hot roll bonding following similar processing paths. The first one is constituted by alternated Al 2024 and Al 1050 layers (ALH19) and the second one by alternated Al 7075 and Al 1050 layers (ADH19). The influence of the constituent materials in the multilayer laminates both during the processing at high temperature, and during the subsequent mechanical characterization has been analyzed. The mechanical behavior of the as-received materials at the processing conditions has been characterized by hot torsion. Multilayer laminates have been tested at room temperature under impact Charpy tests, three-point bend tests and shear tests on the interfaces. The relative toughness increase compared to the constituent materials was much higher for the ADH19 laminate based on high strength Al 7075 alloy than for the ALH19 laminate. This is attributed to the different fracture mechanism.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010
2011
2011
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43748
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/43748
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-0069-x
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869418071117004800
score 15,198674