Optimal Seismic Retrofit Alternative for Shear Deficient RC Beams: A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach
[EN] The vulnerability of existing buildings to recent earthquakes underscores the critical need to explore effective retrofit solutions thoroughly. This study presents a comprehensive methodology for ranking seismic retrofit alternatives for reinforced concrete beams with shear deficiencies. It eva...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/229981 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/229981 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Decision making Life cycle assessments MCDM Retrofit Seismic 09.- Desarrollar infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible, y fomentar la innovación |
| Sumario: | [EN] The vulnerability of existing buildings to recent earthquakes underscores the critical need to explore effective retrofit solutions thoroughly. This study presents a comprehensive methodology for ranking seismic retrofit alternatives for reinforced concrete beams with shear deficiencies. It evaluates five alternatives to ensure a 50-year service life, meeting current seismic standards and incorporating specific preventive maintenance measures for each option. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment was used to analyze the impacts associated with the sustainability of each alternative. Hybridization of emerging multi-criteria decision-making methods was applied for criteria weighting and final ranking, and a hierarchical model including economic, environmental, social, and functional criteria was developed. The results highlight carbon fiber reinforcements and steel plates with epoxy adhesives as optimal solutions due to their lower environmental and social impact, along with improvements in execution time and minimal architectural impact. This study underscores the necessity of a comprehensive approach to identifying optimal retrofitting alternatives, demonstrating the imperative to complement the conventional structural engineering objective of ensuring safety while minimizing investment. |
|---|