Comprehensive Assessment of Mental Health Stigma
Background: Mental health (MH) stigma is one of the main barriers to young people with MH problems seeking help. This study attempts to analyse it using the Stigma and Self-Stigma scales (SASS) in a representative sample of young people, novel aspects being the comprehensive perspective of the instr...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI) |
| Repositorio: | RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:ruo_________::cd68e9deaf5e1ab5d9fb52b47f6ee213 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10651/83718 https://dx.doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2026.38.06 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Mental health stigma Gender differences Measurement invariance University students SASS |
| Sumario: | Background: Mental health (MH) stigma is one of the main barriers to young people with MH problems seeking help. This study attempts to analyse it using the Stigma and Self-Stigma scales (SASS) in a representative sample of young people, novel aspects being the comprehensive perspective of the instrument used and the analysis of gender effects, both from a psychometric perspective (measurement invariance) and analysis of the differences according to the gender variable. Method: 378 students (M = 20.78 years; SD = 1.65; 61.6% women) participated, selected through a stratified random cluster sampling approach. The scale’s internal structure and its measurement invariance between genders were examined. Results: The five-factor model of the SASS showed adequate goodness-of-fit indices. Scalar invariance between genders was confirmed for the five-dimensional model, along with higher levels of stigma in several dimensions among boys. Cronbach’s α for the different subscales ranged from .62 to .80, and McDonald’s ω from .60 to .79. Conclusions: The SASS is a brief, simple, and reliable instrument for assessing different dimensions of MH stigma in university settings |
|---|