Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Detection by ddPCR in Adequately Ventilated Hospital Corridors
Indoors, the infection risk of diseases transmitted through the airborne route is estimated from indoor carbon dioxide (CO) levels. However, the approaches to assess this risk do not account for the airborne concentration of pathogens, among other limitations. In this study, we analyzed the relation...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears |
| Repositorio: | Docusalut |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/25703 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/25703 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission bioaerosol carbon dioxide ddPCR |
| Sumario: | Indoors, the infection risk of diseases transmitted through the airborne route is estimated from indoor carbon dioxide (CO) levels. However, the approaches to assess this risk do not account for the airborne concentration of pathogens, among other limitations. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between airborne SARS-CoV-2 levels and environmental parameters. Bioaerosols were sampled ( = 40) in hospital corridors of two wards differing in the COVID-19 severity of the admitted patients. SARS-CoV-2 levels were quantified using droplet digital PCR. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 60% of the total air samples. The ward where the mildly ill patients were admitted had a higher occupancy, transit of people in the corridor, and CO levels, but there were no significant differences in SARS-CoV-2 detection between wards. The mean CO concentration in the positive samples was 569 ± 35.6 ppm. Considering all samples, the CO levels in the corridor were positively correlated with patient door openings but inversely correlated with SARS-CoV-2 levels. In conclusion, airborne SARS-CoV-2 can be detected indoors with optimal ventilation, and its levels do not scale with CO concentration in hospital corridors. Therefore, CO assessment should not be interpreted as a surrogate of airborne viral presence in all indoor spaces. |
|---|