Estimation methods to define reference evapotranspiration: a comparative perspective
Evapotranspiration is a key variable for hydrologic, climatic, agricultural, and environmental studies. Given the non-availability of economically and technically easy to implement direct measurement methods, evapotranspiration is estimated primarily through the application of empirical and regressi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/270506 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/270506 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85129800180 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Regression models Empirical models Evapotranspiration prediction Machine learning Reference evapotranspiration |
| Sumario: | Evapotranspiration is a key variable for hydrologic, climatic, agricultural, and environmental studies. Given the non-availability of economically and technically easy to implement direct measurement methods, evapotranspiration is estimated primarily through the application of empirical and regression models, and machine learning algorithms that incorporate conventional meteorological variables. While the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith equation worldwide has been recognized as the most accurate equation to estimate the reference evapotranspiration (ETo), the number of required climatic variables makes its application questionable for regions with limited ground-based climate data. This note provides a summary of empirical and semi-empirical equations linked to its data requirement and the problems associated with these models (transferability and data quality), an overview of regression models, the potential of machine learning algorithms in regression tasks, trends of reference evapotran-spiration studies, and some recommendations of the topics future research should address that would lead to a further improvement of the performance and generalization of the available models. The terminology used in this note is consistent in both the theoretical and practical field of evapotranspiration, which is often dispersed in the academic literature. The goal of this note is to provide some perspective to stimulate discussion. |
|---|