Treatment with robot-assisted gait trainer Walkbot along with physiotherapy vs isolated physiotherapy in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Experimental study.

Background: Improving walking ability is a key objective in the treatment of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy, since it directly affects their activity and participation. In recent years, robotic technology has been implemented in gait treatment, which allows training of longer duration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Olmos Gómez, Raquel, Calvo Muñoz, Inmaculada, Gómez Conesa, Antonia
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM)
Repositorio:RIUCAM. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ucam.edu:10952/9826
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10952/9826
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Adolescents
Cerebral palsy
Children
Experimental study
Gait
Physical therapy modalities
Robotic
Walkbot
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Improving walking ability is a key objective in the treatment of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy, since it directly affects their activity and participation. In recent years, robotic technology has been implemented in gait treatment, which allows training of longer duration and repetition of the movement. To know the effectiveness of a treatment with the robotic-assisted gait trainer Walkbot combined with physiotherapy compared to the isolated physiotherapy treatment in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy, we carried out a clinical trial. Methods: 23 participants, were divided into two groups: experimental and control. During 5 weeks, both groups received their physiotherapy sessions scheduled, in addition experimental group received 4 sessions per week of 40 min of robot. An evaluation of the participants was carried out before the intervention, at the end of the intervention, and at follow-up (two months after the end of the intervention). Gait was assessed with the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 dimensions D and E, strength was measured with a hydraulic dynamometer, and range of motion was assessed using the goniometer. A mixed ANOVA was performed when the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity were met, and a robust mixed ANOVA was performed when these assumptions were not met. Statistical significance was stipulated at p < 0.05. For the effect size, η2 was calculated. Results: Significant differences were found regarding the time x group interaction in the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 in dimension D [η2 = 0.016], in the flexion strength of the left [η2 = 0.128] and right [η2 = 0.142] hips, in the extension strength of the right hip [η2 = 0.035], in the abduction strength of the left hip [η2 = 0.179] and right [η2 = 0.196], in the flexion strength of the left knee [η2 = 0.222] and right [η2 = 0.147], and in the range of motion of left [η2 = 0.071] and right [η2 = 0.053] knee flexion. Conclusions: Compared to treatments without walking robot, physiotherapy treatment including Walkbot improves standing, muscle strength, and knee range of motion in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.