Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law

The rules on prescription in Part VI!I, Chapter 18, of the Proposa! for a Connnon European Sales Law (CESL) follow the provisions of the Principies of European Contract Law (PECL) and the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), which, in general, have deserved favourable comments. Yet, a number of r...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Arroyo i Amayuelas, Esther, Vaquer Aloy, Antoni
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2013
País:España
Recursos:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)
Repositorio:Repositori Obert UdL
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/48109
Acesso em linha:https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2013-0002
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/48109
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Dret comparat
Derecho civil
Dret civil
Comparative law
Civil law
id ES_b3dafaf6294ffbcf125ea2c5b09c4f11
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/48109
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales LawArroyo i Amayuelas, EstherVaquer Aloy, AntoniDret comparatDerecho civilDret comparatDret civilComparative lawCivil lawThe rules on prescription in Part VI!I, Chapter 18, of the Proposa! for a Connnon European Sales Law (CESL) follow the provisions of the Principies of European Contract Law (PECL) and the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), which, in general, have deserved favourable comments. Yet, a number of rules contained in those texts have been omitted. !t is necessary to ascertain whether the CESL rules only apply to provisions on rights and claims resulting from sales or related services contracts, or whether they are also applicable to any other contractual right or claim and also to rights or claims of non-contractuai origin. One of the most problematic issues concerns general prescription periods: firstly, because there are two general periods, a short one and a long one, without any specification about the claims or rights covered by each one of !hem; secondly, because neither period is suitable in case of non-conformity. There are also some interpretation problems due to missing, ambiguous or defective defini­ tions. The systematic approach demands clarification too.De Gruyter2013info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2013-0002http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/48109reponame:Repositori Obert UdL instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)InglésReproducció del document publicat a http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ercl-2013-9-issue-1/ercl-2013-0002/ercl-2013-0002.xmlEuropean Review of Contract Law, 2013, vol. 9, num. 1, p. 38-60(c) De Gruyter, 2013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/481092026-06-24T12:42:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
title Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
spellingShingle Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
Arroyo i Amayuelas, Esther
Dret comparat
Derecho civil
Dret comparat
Dret civil
Comparative law
Civil law
title_short Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
title_full Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
title_fullStr Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
title_full_unstemmed Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
title_sort Prescription in the Proposal for a Common European Sales Law
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arroyo i Amayuelas, Esther
Vaquer Aloy, Antoni
author Arroyo i Amayuelas, Esther
author_facet Arroyo i Amayuelas, Esther
Vaquer Aloy, Antoni
author_role author
author2 Vaquer Aloy, Antoni
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Dret comparat
Derecho civil
Dret comparat
Dret civil
Comparative law
Civil law
topic Dret comparat
Derecho civil
Dret comparat
Dret civil
Comparative law
Civil law
description The rules on prescription in Part VI!I, Chapter 18, of the Proposa! for a Connnon European Sales Law (CESL) follow the provisions of the Principies of European Contract Law (PECL) and the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), which, in general, have deserved favourable comments. Yet, a number of rules contained in those texts have been omitted. !t is necessary to ascertain whether the CESL rules only apply to provisions on rights and claims resulting from sales or related services contracts, or whether they are also applicable to any other contractual right or claim and also to rights or claims of non-contractuai origin. One of the most problematic issues concerns general prescription periods: firstly, because there are two general periods, a short one and a long one, without any specification about the claims or rights covered by each one of !hem; secondly, because neither period is suitable in case of non-conformity. There are also some interpretation problems due to missing, ambiguous or defective defini­ tions. The systematic approach demands clarification too.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2013-0002
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/48109
url https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2013-0002
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/48109
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproducció del document publicat a http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ercl-2013-9-issue-1/ercl-2013-0002/ercl-2013-0002.xml
European Review of Contract Law, 2013, vol. 9, num. 1, p. 38-60
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) De Gruyter, 2013
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) De Gruyter, 2013
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv De Gruyter
publisher.none.fl_str_mv De Gruyter
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositori Obert UdL
instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)
instname_str Universitat de Lleida (UdL)
reponame_str Repositori Obert UdL
collection Repositori Obert UdL
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869417211775418368
score 15,811543

Registos relacionados