Red and blue light differentially impact retrograde signalling and photoprotection in rice

Chloroplast-to-nucleus retrograde signalling (RS) is known to impact plant growth and development. In Arabidopsis, we and others have shown that RS affects seedling establishment by inhibiting deetiolation. In the presence of lincomycin, a chloroplast protein synthesis inhibitor that triggers RS, Ar...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Duan, Liu|||0000-0003-4034-1152, Ruiz-Sola, M. Águila|||0000-0002-2281-6700, Couso, Ana, Veciana Fonts, Nil|||0000-0002-1761-6616, Monte Collado, Elena|||0000-0002-7340-9355
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2020
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositório:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:222100
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/222100
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0402
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Blue and red light
Photomorphogenes
Photoprotection
Retrograde signalling
Non-photochemical quenching
Rice
Descrição
Resumo:Chloroplast-to-nucleus retrograde signalling (RS) is known to impact plant growth and development. In Arabidopsis, we and others have shown that RS affects seedling establishment by inhibiting deetiolation. In the presence of lincomycin, a chloroplast protein synthesis inhibitor that triggers RS, Arabidopsis light-grown seedlings display partial skotomorphogenesis with undeveloped plastids and closed cotyledons. By contrast, RS in monocotyledonous has been much less studied. Here, we show that emerging rice seedlings exposed to lincomycin do not accumulate chlorophyll but otherwise remain remarkably unaffected. However, by using high red (R) and blue (B) monochromatic lights in combination with lincomycin, we have uncovered a RS inhibition of length and a reduction in the B light-induced declination of the second leaf. Furthermore, we present data showing that seedlings grown in high B and R light display different non-photochemical quenching capacity. Our findings support the view that excess B and R light impact seedling photomorphogenesis differently to photoprotect and optimize the response to high-light stress.