Resilience in women with breast cancer: A systematic review
Purpose: Resilience refers to a dynamic process that promotes a successful adaptation to cancer-related adversity. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the biopsychosocial factors involved in the resilience of women with breast cancer and to integrate evidence on the interventions that...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad del País Vasco |
| Repositorio: | Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:addi.ehu.eus:10810/77570 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/77570 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | breast cancer survivors breast cancer patients resilience interventions |
| Sumario: | Purpose: Resilience refers to a dynamic process that promotes a successful adaptation to cancer-related adversity. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the biopsychosocial factors involved in the resilience of women with breast cancer and to integrate evidence on the interventions that can contribute to significantly enhancing it. Method: Three databases were searched. In all, 923 articles were identified and, of these, 39 peer-reviewed articles were included. Results: Resilience was associated with multiple clinical, sociodemographic, social, psychological and physiological variables, with psychological factors being the most important contributors to the development of resilience. Some protective factors were identified, such as social support, several dimensions of quality of life (QOL) and adaptive coping strategies. Psychological distress was the variable most frequently linked to reductions in resilience, finding a bidirectional relationship between them. Resilience-promoting interventions were found to be effective in improving participants' psychological well-being. Conclusion: Resilience is a relevant factor related with several sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial and physiological variables in women with breast cancer. However, limitations such as the wide variability of instruments used together with the heterogeneity and small size of the samples restrict the generalizability of our conclusions. |
|---|