What metalinguistic negotiations can't do

Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements - how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste disputes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Marques, Teresa
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
OAI Identifier:oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/147063
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147063
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Filosofia del llenguatge
Metallenguatge
Norma (Filosofia)
Discussió
Philosophy of language
Metalanguage
Norm (Philosophy)
Discussion
id ES_b0ae9d289b71cf7d60091d5f027b3521
oai_identifier_str oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/147063
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling What metalinguistic negotiations can't doMarques, TeresaFilosofia del llenguatgeMetallenguatgeNorma (Filosofia)DiscussióPhilosophy of languageMetalanguageNorm (Philosophy)DiscussionPhilosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements - how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste disputes could be explained as metalinguistic negotiations - conversations where interlocutors negotiate how best to use a word relative to a context. I argue here that metalinguistic negotiations are neither necessary nor sufficient for genuine evaluative and normative disputes to occur. A comprehensive account of value talk requires stronger metanormative commitments than metalinguistic negotiations afford.Firenze University Press2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/147063Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UBinstname:Universidad de BarcelonaInglésReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-21104Phenomenology and Mind, 2017, num. 12, p. 40-48https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-21104info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/675415cc-by (c) Marques, Teresa, 2017http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/esinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/1470632026-05-27T06:46:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
title What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
spellingShingle What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
Marques, Teresa
Filosofia del llenguatge
Metallenguatge
Norma (Filosofia)
Discussió
Philosophy of language
Metalanguage
Norm (Philosophy)
Discussion
title_short What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
title_full What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
title_fullStr What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
title_full_unstemmed What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
title_sort What metalinguistic negotiations can't do
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Marques, Teresa
author Marques, Teresa
author_facet Marques, Teresa
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Filosofia del llenguatge
Metallenguatge
Norma (Filosofia)
Discussió
Philosophy of language
Metalanguage
Norm (Philosophy)
Discussion
topic Filosofia del llenguatge
Metallenguatge
Norma (Filosofia)
Discussió
Philosophy of language
Metalanguage
Norm (Philosophy)
Discussion
description Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements - how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste disputes could be explained as metalinguistic negotiations - conversations where interlocutors negotiate how best to use a word relative to a context. I argue here that metalinguistic negotiations are neither necessary nor sufficient for genuine evaluative and normative disputes to occur. A comprehensive account of value talk requires stronger metanormative commitments than metalinguistic negotiations afford.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147063
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147063
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-21104
Phenomenology and Mind, 2017, num. 12, p. 40-48
https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-21104
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/675415
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv cc-by (c) Marques, Teresa, 2017
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv cc-by (c) Marques, Teresa, 2017
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Firenze University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Firenze University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
instname:Universidad de Barcelona
instname_str Universidad de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de la UB
collection Dipòsit Digital de la UB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869416847252652032
score 15.300719

Similares en LA Referencia