Atrial functional and geometrical remodeling in highly trained male athletes: for better or worse?
Purpose Highly trained athletes have an increased risk of atrial arrhythmias. Atrial geometrical and functional remodeling may be the underlying substrate. We analyze and relate atrial size, deformation and performance in professional handball players compared with non-sportive subjects. Methods 24...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/43505 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/43505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2845-6 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Atrial strain Atrial function Echocardiography Wall stress Exercise |
| Sumario: | Purpose Highly trained athletes have an increased risk of atrial arrhythmias. Atrial geometrical and functional remodeling may be the underlying substrate. We analyze and relate atrial size, deformation and performance in professional handball players compared with non-sportive subjects. Methods 24 Professional handball players and 20 non-sportive males were compared. All subjects underwent an echocardiographic study with evaluation of left (LA), right atrial (RA) dimensions and deformation by strain (Sa) and strain rate (SRa). Atrial performance was assessed from the atrial stroke volume (SV). With computational geometrical models, we studied the relation between atrial volumes, strains and SV and compared atrial working conditions. We estimated the functional reserve and a resulting average wall stress. Results LA and RA volumes were larger in athletes than in controls (35.2 ± 8.8 vs. 24.8 ± 4.3 ml/m2, p < 0.01 and 29.0 ± 8.4 vs. 19.0 ± 5.1 ml/m2, p < 0.01 respectively). LASa and RASa during active atrial contraction were decreased in athletes (−12.2 ± 2.0 vs. −14.5 ± 2.1 %, p < 0.01 and −12.1 ± 1.8 vs. −14.2 ± 1.5 %, p < 0.01 respectively). LASV was similar between groups (6.6 ± 1.4 vs. 7.3 ± 1.1 ml, p = 0.19) and RASV was lower in athletes (6.2 ± 1.3 vs. 7.2 ± 1.1 ml, p < 0.01). Computational models showed that this different operational mode potentially increases performance reserve, but at the cost of higher atrial wall stress. Conclusion A proportion of athletes with enlarged LA and RA showed different atrial contractile performance, likely resulting in atria working at higher wall stress. |
|---|