A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation

Increased access to genome-wide data provides new opportunities for plant conservation. However, information on neutral genetic diversity in a small number of marker loci can still be valuable because genomic data are not available to most rare plant species. In the hope of bridging the gap between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Chung, Mi Yoon, Merilä, Juha, Kim, Yuseob, Mao, Kangshan, López-Pujol, Jordi, Chung, Myong Gi
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/307782
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/307782
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9926
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Adaptive variation
Conservation
Genetic diversity
Herbaceous plants
Neutral variation
Woody species
id ES_adf192d3e31e9d1c2d82f99a2fa0697a
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/307782
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservationChung, Mi YoonMerilä, JuhaKim, YuseobMao, KangshanLópez-Pujol, JordiChung, Myong GiAdaptive variationConservationGenetic diversityHerbaceous plantsNeutral variationWoody speciesIncreased access to genome-wide data provides new opportunities for plant conservation. However, information on neutral genetic diversity in a small number of marker loci can still be valuable because genomic data are not available to most rare plant species. In the hope of bridging the gap between conservation science and practice, we outline how conservation practitioners can more efficiently employ population genetic information in plant conservation. We first review the current knowledge about neutral genetic variation (NGV) and adaptive genetic variation (AGV) in seed plants, regarding both within-population and among-population components. We then introduce the estimates of among-population genetic differentiation in quantitative traits (QST) and neutral markers (FST) to plant biology and summarize conservation applications derived from QST¿FST comparisons, particularly on how to capture most AGV and NGV on both in-situ and ex-situ programs. Based on a review of published studies, we found that, on average, two and four populations would be needed for woody perennials (n = 18) to capture 99% of NGV and AGV, respectively, whereas four populations would be needed in case of herbaceous perennials (n = 14). On average, QST is about 3.6, 1.5, and 1.1 times greater than FST in woody plants, annuals, and herbaceous perennials, respectively. Hence, conservation and management policies or suggestions based solely on inference on FST could be misleading, particularly in woody species. To maximize the preservation of the maximum levels of both AGV and NGV, we suggest using maximum QST rather than average QST. We recommend conservation managers and practitioners consider this when formulating further conservation and restoration plans for plant species, particularly woody species.This work was supported by the research fund of Chungnam National University, the Republic of Korea to MYCAbstract 1 INTRODUCTION 2 COMPARISON OF WITHIN-POPULATION GENETIC VARIATION: NEUTRAL MARKERS VERSUS ADAPTIVE TRAITS 3 COMPARISON OF AMONG-POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION: NEUTRAL MARKERS VERSUS ADAPTIVE TRAITS 4 APPLICATION OF QST–FST COMPARISONS TO PLANT BIOLOGY 5 INSIGHTS INTO CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION DERIVED FROM QST–FST COMPARISONS 6 CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVE AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FUNDING INFORMATION CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT REFERENCESPeer reviewedJohn Wiley & SonsChungnam National UniversityConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]2023202320232023info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/307782https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9926reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Ingléshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9926Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3077822026-05-22T06:33:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
title A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
spellingShingle A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
Chung, Mi Yoon
Adaptive variation
Conservation
Genetic diversity
Herbaceous plants
Neutral variation
Woody species
title_short A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
title_full A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
title_fullStr A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
title_full_unstemmed A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
title_sort A review on QST-FST comparisons of seed plants: Insights for conservation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chung, Mi Yoon
Merilä, Juha
Kim, Yuseob
Mao, Kangshan
López-Pujol, Jordi
Chung, Myong Gi
author Chung, Mi Yoon
author_facet Chung, Mi Yoon
Merilä, Juha
Kim, Yuseob
Mao, Kangshan
López-Pujol, Jordi
Chung, Myong Gi
author_role author
author2 Merilä, Juha
Kim, Yuseob
Mao, Kangshan
López-Pujol, Jordi
Chung, Myong Gi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Chungnam National University
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Adaptive variation
Conservation
Genetic diversity
Herbaceous plants
Neutral variation
Woody species
topic Adaptive variation
Conservation
Genetic diversity
Herbaceous plants
Neutral variation
Woody species
description Increased access to genome-wide data provides new opportunities for plant conservation. However, information on neutral genetic diversity in a small number of marker loci can still be valuable because genomic data are not available to most rare plant species. In the hope of bridging the gap between conservation science and practice, we outline how conservation practitioners can more efficiently employ population genetic information in plant conservation. We first review the current knowledge about neutral genetic variation (NGV) and adaptive genetic variation (AGV) in seed plants, regarding both within-population and among-population components. We then introduce the estimates of among-population genetic differentiation in quantitative traits (QST) and neutral markers (FST) to plant biology and summarize conservation applications derived from QST¿FST comparisons, particularly on how to capture most AGV and NGV on both in-situ and ex-situ programs. Based on a review of published studies, we found that, on average, two and four populations would be needed for woody perennials (n = 18) to capture 99% of NGV and AGV, respectively, whereas four populations would be needed in case of herbaceous perennials (n = 14). On average, QST is about 3.6, 1.5, and 1.1 times greater than FST in woody plants, annuals, and herbaceous perennials, respectively. Hence, conservation and management policies or suggestions based solely on inference on FST could be misleading, particularly in woody species. To maximize the preservation of the maximum levels of both AGV and NGV, we suggest using maximum QST rather than average QST. We recommend conservation managers and practitioners consider this when formulating further conservation and restoration plans for plant species, particularly woody species.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2023
2023
2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/307782
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9926
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/307782
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9926
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9926
Sí
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869416501600059392
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia